2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Insomnia Severity Index in a sample of family dementia caregivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ISI score was signi cantly higher in males than females, which means men are suffering from insomnia more than women. This was surprising as it contradicted other studies [23]- [25] where females had higher ISI scores and were more prone to suffer from sleep problems. However, even with this signi cant difference, both genders reported ISI scores that lay within the same type of insomnia (subthreshold).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…ISI score was signi cantly higher in males than females, which means men are suffering from insomnia more than women. This was surprising as it contradicted other studies [23]- [25] where females had higher ISI scores and were more prone to suffer from sleep problems. However, even with this signi cant difference, both genders reported ISI scores that lay within the same type of insomnia (subthreshold).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…A five-point Likert scale rates each item (from 0 = No problem to 4 = very severe problems) yielding the total score ranging from 0 to 28. Previous research shows that this scale has acceptable psychometric properties in various countries worldwide [27][28][29][30][31]. The internal consistency of the ISI was a = 0.85 based on the current sample.…”
Section: Insomniamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In 2021, the ISI was validated in family caregivers of adults with dementia. 28 Individual items from the ISI were included to describe different aspects of sleep difficulty among caregivers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%