2010
DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2011.524600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Scale: Comparison to the Beck Anxiety Inventory and Geriatric Anxiety Inventory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the researchers noted that the sample sizes were not large enough to conduct factor analyses to examine the underlying factor structure of the GAS, and thus the subscales remained conceptually designed instead of empirically based. Yochim et al (2011) further examined the psychometric properties of the GAS in a communitydwelling sample of 117 older adults. As in Segal et al (2010), the GAS was found to have excellent internal consistency (α = 0.90), and significantly correlated with other measures of anxiety (evidence of convergent validity).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the researchers noted that the sample sizes were not large enough to conduct factor analyses to examine the underlying factor structure of the GAS, and thus the subscales remained conceptually designed instead of empirically based. Yochim et al (2011) further examined the psychometric properties of the GAS in a communitydwelling sample of 117 older adults. As in Segal et al (2010), the GAS was found to have excellent internal consistency (α = 0.90), and significantly correlated with other measures of anxiety (evidence of convergent validity).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined the psychometric properties of the GAI and found good internal consistency as measured with the Kuder-Richardson 20 coefficient (KR-20 = 0.82). Additional studies provide evidence of convergent validity [18,[23][24] and discriminant validity [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with several well-established measures designed for use with older adults, including the Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS), the Older Adult Social-Evaluative Situations Questionnaire (OASES), and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), we shortened the response set in an effort to simplify the measure for use with the geriatric population (Gould, Gerolimatos, Ciliberti, Edelstein, & Smith, 2012; Yesavage et al, 1983; Yochim, Mueller, June, & Segal, 2011). A 3-point scale was used rather than a “yes/no” format because the authors hypothesized that including a third, central response of “somewhat true for me” would allow for a more sensitive measure of subjects’ experiences and provide a further degree of information regarding the intensity of their feelings than a 2-point scale, yet was unlikely to burden subjects with a confusing array of choices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though no empirical research examining the benefits of utilizing shorter response sets with older adults has been published to our knowledge, many researchers propose that fewer response options aid in easing the administration of measures with the geriatric population (Yesavage et al, 1983; Yochim, Mueller, June, & Segal, 2011). In addition, research has shown that difficulties in completing measures via self-administration increase with age, impaired cognition, and poor health (McHorney, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%