2001
DOI: 10.1080/08039480151108561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Finnish 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale

Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure and the validity of the Finnish version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). As part of the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort Project, the TAS-20 was presented to a sample of 5034 31-year old persons. A confirmatory factor analysis showed that the three-factor model, earlier established with the original TAS-20, was in agreement with the Finnish version of the scale. Three criteria of goodness-of-fit met the standards for adequacy of fit.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Severity of depression was objectively assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [17] and the self-reported severity of depression by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-21) [18]. Alexithymia was assessed using the validated Finnish version [19] of TAS-20, which is a self-report questionnaire. The original English version of the TAS-20 has been validated by Bagby et al [20, 21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severity of depression was objectively assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [17] and the self-reported severity of depression by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-21) [18]. Alexithymia was assessed using the validated Finnish version [19] of TAS-20, which is a self-report questionnaire. The original English version of the TAS-20 has been validated by Bagby et al [20, 21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TAS-20 has been cross-validated in different languages, for example Italian (Bressi et al, 1996), Finnish (Joukamaa et al, 2001), Japanese (Komaki et al, 2003), Hindi (Pandey, Mandal, Taylor, & Parker, 1996), German (Parker, Bagby, Taylor, Endler, & Smithz, 1993), and Swedish (Simonsson-Sarnecki et al, 2000; for a review see ; and in different populations, like community populations , clinical versus non-clinical populations (Loas et al, 2001), and different cultures (Parker, Shaughnessy, Wood, Majeski, & Eastabrook, 2005). originally proposed a three-factor structure with factor 1: difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), factor 2: difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and factor 3: externally oriented thinking Factorial Validity 4 (EOT).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnoses were made by using an appropriate interview technique. The psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the TAS-20 have been shown to be satisfactory [29]. A notable factor in the intervention process was the multi professional working group; and the fact that the working group remained the same during the entire process from 2004-2009 ensuring quality and consistency in the intervention process.…”
Section: Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity have been demonstrated to be good [25][26][27][28]. The psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the TAS-20 have been shown to be satisfactory [29]. The items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%