2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) with substance abusers in outpatient and residential treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
93
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The AUDIT cut-off score was not based on sensitivity or specificity research, as it is for adults in the general population (Berman et al, 2005). Although a cut-off score for the DUDIT has been recommended in studies assessing problematic use of prescribed drugs (Voluse et al, 2012), whether we appropriately captured users who had a problematic use remains unknown. Another argument is that our participants used psychotropic drugs which are socially acceptable (Johannessen et al, 2015), even if older people have a slower metabolism of medication.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AUDIT cut-off score was not based on sensitivity or specificity research, as it is for adults in the general population (Berman et al, 2005). Although a cut-off score for the DUDIT has been recommended in studies assessing problematic use of prescribed drugs (Voluse et al, 2012), whether we appropriately captured users who had a problematic use remains unknown. Another argument is that our participants used psychotropic drugs which are socially acceptable (Johannessen et al, 2015), even if older people have a slower metabolism of medication.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total scores range from 0 to 44, with higher scores suggesting a more severe drug problem. In our study, which assessed psychotropic drugs in older people, we used the DUDIT to initially identify any use of prescribed psychotropic drugs and then determine the number of participants meeting a cut-off score of 6 for women and 8 for men (Voluse et al, 2012). Cognitive function was assessed by the Norwegian revised version of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Engedal, Laake, Haugen, & Gilje, 1988;Folstein, Folstein, & McHugh, 1975;Strobel & Engedal, 2008).…”
Section: Assessment Of the Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DUDIT was selected as a comparison measure for the DAST because it is frequently used in the drug abuse field and has demonstrated sound psychometric properties (10). DUDIT is an 11-item selfreport questionnaire that was developed to screen individuals for drug problems.…”
Section: Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (Dudit)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voluse, Gioia, Sobell, Dum, Sobell, and Simco [68] suggested a cut-off score of 8, with adequate sensitivity and specificity scores (0.90 and 0.85 respectively). The DUDIT has been shown to be a reliable and valid instrument for measuring drug misuse [67][68][69]. In the current study, the DUDIT had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.95.…”
Section: The Drug Use Disorder Identification Test (Dudit) [67]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the cut-off s for AUDIT scores [63], 58.4% of participants met the criteria for alcohol misuse, and 3.8% of participants met the criteria for alcohol dependence. Based on the cutoff for DUDIT scores [68], 49.8% of participants met the criteria for drug misuse. The most commonly used drug was marijuana or hashish (26.3%), and was followed by cigarettes, cigars, or pipe tobacco (17.7%).…”
Section: Descriptive Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%