Psychometric Properties of the Clinical Assessment of Prosocial Emotions: Version 1.1 (CAPE 1.1) in Young Males Who Were Incarcerated

Molinuevo, Beatriz; Martínez-Membrives, Esther; Pera-Guardiola, Vanessa; Requena, Albert; Torrent, Noemí; Bonillo, Albert; Batalla, Iolanda; Torrubia, Rafael; Frick, Paul J.

doi:10.1177/0093854819892931

Cited by 8 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, Pechorro et al (2016) found the relationship between measures of callous–unemotional traits on the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory and the ICU was 0.54. Likewise, correlations between callous–unemotional traits, as measured on the CAPE diagnostic interview, and the ICU were 0.54 in one study (Centifanti et al, 2019) and 0.45 in a second study (Molinuevo et al, 2019). Additionally, Waschbusch et al (2015) reported correlations of .50 and .60 between the callous–unemotional subscale of the Nova Scotia IOWA and callous–unemotional traits as measured by the Antisocial Process Screening Device, a predecessor to the ICU, in a sample of elementary school children and clinical sample (respectively).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…This interview-based assessment has demonstrated sound psychometric properties (Centifanti et al, 2019; S. W. Hawes et al, 2019; Molinuevo et al, 2019); however, a brief measure of LPE, designed specifically to be consistent with DSM-5 criteria, would have advantages in clinical contexts where time is often short, as well as in research contexts when numerous assessments are typically done during the same visit.…”

Section: Callous–unemotional Traitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Initial Investigation of the Psychometric Properties of the Limited Prosocial Emotions Questionnaire (LPEQ)

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Callous–unemotional traits, which include lack of remorse or guilt, callousness/lack of empathy, unconcern about performance, and shallow/deficient affect, were included as a specifier of conduct disorder in the current (fifth) edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders under the rubric Limited Prosocial Emotions (LPEs). The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of a new rating scale, the Limited Prosocial Emotions Questionnaire (LPEQ). Caregivers ( n = 1,050) of children ( Mage = 8.42, SD = 2.31) completed the LPEQ and other measures. Results provide support for a single factor model of the LPEQ, with measurement invariance supported across child and informant sex. Both the reliability and validity of the LPEQ as a measure of LPEs were also well supported. Children identified with LPE had significantly greater average impairment and need for treatment relative to children without LPE. Children with conduct problems (i.e., conduct disorder or oppositional defiant disorder), as well those without conduct problems, had significantly more impairment if they were identified as having LPE. Our findings fit with the mounting evidence of the clinical utility of assessing LPEs in children. Future research should look to replicate our findings in clinical samples of youth.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Section: Callous–unemotional Traitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Initial Investigation of the Psychometric Properties of the Limited Prosocial Emotions Questionnaire (LPEQ)

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The goal of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties (factor structure, reliability, and validity) of the Spanish version of the PCL:YV (González et al, 2003) in justice-involved male adolescents from three samples (González, 2010;Hilterman et al, 2014;Molinuevo et al, 2014Molinuevo et al, , 2020.…”

Section: The Current Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version

Ivanova-Serokhvostova

Molinuevo

González

et al. 2022

Curr Psychol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study examined the psychometric properties (factor structure, reliability and validity) of the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV; Forth et al., 2003) in Spanish samples of male justice-involved youths between 15 and 22-years old. The PCL:YV was administered to two groups of youths who were incarcerated (n = 62; n = 95) and a sample of youth on probation (n = 122). Confirmatory factor analyses showed acceptable-to-good fit for three- and four-factor models. The four-factor hierarchical model with a second-order higher factor representing the whole psychopathy construct was considered for further analyses. PCL:YV scores showed high internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. Low-to-moderate convergence with other measures of psychopathic traits evinced an adequate convergent validity. Convergent and discriminant validity of the PCL:YV total scores were also confirmed considering several measures of psychopathology and personality traits. Importantly, the differential external correlates of the PCL:YV factors provide support for a multidimensional conceptualization of the psychopathy construct. Altogether, these results reveal adequate psychometric properties of the PCL:YV in Spanish population of justice-involved youths and justifies its use to assess psychopathic traits in this kind of populations.

show abstract

“…The CAPE 1.1 has been subjected to recent psychometric evaluation and shown promising reliability and validity of symptom counts and diagnostic cutoffs in international samples of high-risk (Centifanti et al, 2020) and detained youth (Molinuevo et al, 2019). Hawes et al (2020) found evidence to support the reliability and validity of the CAPE 1.1 in a clinic-referred sample of children and adolescents (3 to 15 years) with conduct problems.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While the CAPE 1.1 is a promising clinical tool to assess CU traits as defined by the LPE specifier (Hawes et al, 2020; Molinuevo et al, 2019), it requires extensive training in the assessment of psychopathology, extensive training in the CAPE specifically, and a fair amount of time in asking follow-up questions specifically about LPE. Such a clinician rating system may not be feasible in many clinical or research settings where the child needs to be assessed comprehensively for psychopathology by a semi-structured interview and without a clinician with extensive training.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric Properties of a Semistructured Interview to Assess Limited Prosocial Emotions

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Callous-unemotional (CU) traits have recently been added to the diagnostic criteria of Conduct Disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth edition and of conduct–dissocial and oppositional defiant disorders in the International Classification of Disease–Eleventh edition as the limited prosocial emotions specifier. This change necessitates the assessment of these traits with validated measures in both research and clinical contexts. The current study sought to validate a semi-structured diagnostic interview method, the Michigan Limited Prosocial Emotion Addendum (M-LPE) to the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children–Present and Lifetime Version, of assessing CU traits based on a recently developed clinician rating system (Clinical Assessment of Prosocial Emotions, Version 1.1) in a sample of at-risk youth. Results supported the interrater reliability of the M-LPE with moderate agreement and high reliability between raters. The M-LPE demonstrated convergent and incremental validity with CU traits and various measures of antisocial behavior. The results provide preliminary evidence for the use of a semi-structured interview assessment of CU traits in research contexts and build the foundation for further validation.

show abstract

Psychometric Properties of the Clinical Assessment of Prosocial Emotions: Version 1.1 (CAPE 1.1) in Young Males Who Were Incarcerated

Cited by 8 publications

References 41 publications

Initial Investigation of the Psychometric Properties of the Limited Prosocial Emotions Questionnaire (LPEQ)

Initial Investigation of the Psychometric Properties of the Limited Prosocial Emotions Questionnaire (LPEQ)

Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version

Psychometric Properties of a Semistructured Interview to Assess Limited Prosocial Emotions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About