2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
80
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
5
80
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst the SDQ was originally designed for 11–16 years old, its use with younger children has been supported by other studies (Liu et al 2013; Muris et al 2003). In the present study the internal consistency in the parent-report SDQ for total difficulties scores was 0.60 in Taiwan and 0.88 in the UK, while in the TD sibling self-report it was 0.60 and 0.70 in Taiwan and the UK respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whilst the SDQ was originally designed for 11–16 years old, its use with younger children has been supported by other studies (Liu et al 2013; Muris et al 2003). In the present study the internal consistency in the parent-report SDQ for total difficulties scores was 0.60 in Taiwan and 0.88 in the UK, while in the TD sibling self-report it was 0.60 and 0.70 in Taiwan and the UK respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…TD sibling adjustment was assessed using both the parent report and the self-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) (Goodman et al 1998) and the Chinese version (Liu et al 2013). This is a 25-item measure covering emotional, conduct, hyperactivity/inattention, peer problems and prosocial behavior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each behavioral item is rated on a 3-point Likert scale (0 = not true, 1 = somewhat true, and 2 = certainly true) [26]. It has shown good test–retest reliability and moderate to high internal consistency in Taiwan [27]. In this study, we evaluated the prosocial, oppositional-conduct, hyperactivity–inattention, peer problems, and emotional problems based on youth participants’ reports on these subscales of the Chinese version of the SDQ.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Youthinmind Ltd, 2015) As the participants in this study were adolescents (junior and senior high school students), the SDQ version used in this study was the self-report version. This instrument has been widely used worldwide (Gómez-Beneyto, 2013;He, 2013;Liu, 2013), as well as in Indonesia in the previous study (Ang, 2007).…”
Section: Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (Sdq)mentioning
confidence: 99%