2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of Pressure Pain Thresholds Measured in 2 Positions for Adults With and Without Neck-Shoulder Pain and Tenderness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 14 Moreover, the reliability, consistency, and repeatability of CROM and PPTs in maxillofacial applications are promising. 15 , 16 , 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 14 Moreover, the reliability, consistency, and repeatability of CROM and PPTs in maxillofacial applications are promising. 15 , 16 , 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been demonstrated that the pressure pain threshold (PPT) test is useful to detect sensitization of deep tissues, 13 and could be used as an indicator for somatosensory dysfunction 14 . Moreover, the reliability, consistency, and repeatability of CROM and PPTs in maxillofacial applications are promising 15‐17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because QST measurements are time consuming a suggestion could be to use the algometer in clinical practice to investigate the functional state of the somatosensory system. Wang-Price et al 45 suppose using the algometer is accessible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure pain threshold: The amount of pressure applied until the subject referred to pain for first time [ 25 ]. According to this, the sensitivity of the subacromial region and of distal, middle and proximal regions of the supraspinatus muscle were also considered, locating mechanosensible points on the upper trapezius close to the anatomical projection of supraspinatus trigger points [ 14 ] and pressing on them with an algometer until pain was felt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the pressure reached was collected as the threshold where pain appeared. The reliability of this method was evaluated, showing a fair-to-excellent reliability [ 25 ]; the ICC ranged 0.78–0.93, and the coefficient of variation ranged from 10% to 22% [ 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%