2020
DOI: 10.18502/jmehm.v13i18.4826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of Persian version of the research misconduct questionnaire (PRMQ)

Abstract: Assessment of scientific misconduct is considered to be an increasingly important topic in medical sciences. Providing a definition for scientific research misconduct and proposing practical methods for evaluating and measuring it in various fields of medicine discipline are required. This study aimed at assessing the psychometric properties of Scientific Research Misconduct-Revised (SMQ-R) and Publication Pressure Questionnaires (PPQ). After translation and merging of these two questionnaires, the validity of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher scores indicate more positive ethical climates. Khalesi et al examined the validity of this scale in Iran, and the reliability of this instrument was confirmed by a Cronbach's alpha of 0.94 (Khalesi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher scores indicate more positive ethical climates. Khalesi et al examined the validity of this scale in Iran, and the reliability of this instrument was confirmed by a Cronbach's alpha of 0.94 (Khalesi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%