2017
DOI: 10.1002/nau.23447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties and validation of two global impression questionnaires (PGI‐S, PGI‐I) for stress incontinence in a German‐speaking female population

Abstract: Our results demonstrated good psychometric properties of the German-language PGI-S and PGI in German-speaking women with SUI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is highly reliable and can effectively evaluate the course of disease and treatment effect in patients suffering from KOA. PGI-I is a global index that can be applied to assess a condition’s response to therapy ( Viktrup et al, 2012 ; Bjelic-Radisic et al, 2018 ). PGI-I has only been tested on women undergoing stress incontinence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is highly reliable and can effectively evaluate the course of disease and treatment effect in patients suffering from KOA. PGI-I is a global index that can be applied to assess a condition’s response to therapy ( Viktrup et al, 2012 ; Bjelic-Radisic et al, 2018 ). PGI-I has only been tested on women undergoing stress incontinence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 36 Although the questionnaire has not been used in patients with POP, it has been proved to be valid in patients with stress UI. 37 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire measures patient’s feelings on change of symptoms after treatment with seven levels (major improvement, moderate improvement, mild improvement, no improvement, mild worsening, moderate worsening and major worsening) 36. Although the questionnaire has not been used in patients with POP, it has been proved to be valid in patients with stress UI 37…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded women who underwent surgery more than 10 years before, older than 80 years, previous anti-incontinence surgery and/or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) more than stage I at the POP-Quantification system[ 24 ] in any vaginal compartment. After inclusion and exclusion criteria, all women were invited to complete the following questionnaires: Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S),[ 25 ] Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I),[ 25 ] Sandvik incontinence severity index,[ 26 ] Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6),[ 27 ] Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7),[ 27 ] and Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ-UI) Short Form. [ 28 ] In addition, data about diagnosis, procedures, complications, reoperations, postoperative results, and satisfaction with procedure were recorded.…”
Section: P Atients and M Ethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%