Psychometric properties and factor invariance for the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28): study in Peruvian population exposed to the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

Large-scale epidemics are known to significantly disrupt the mental health and perceived well-being of most populations. In spite of the wide range of screening tools, there are not many reliable and widespread tools for the identification of psychological symptoms in non-clinical populations during a health crisis.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to conduct a psychometric analysis of the Goldberg’s GHQ-28 (1) through a sample of Peruvian adults using confirmatory factor analysis.Materials and methods434 individuals have been examined, studying the goodness and structure of the Goldberg GHQ-28 questionnaire.ResultWe found high reliability indicating optimal values (α by Cronbach = .829), also there are four correlated factors that show strict invariance among the 28 items. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were used to examine the structure of the subscales. There are high levels of anxiety (X=1.01) and social dysfunction (X=1.21) in the assessed sampling.ConclusionThe factorial structure obtained in this study is similar to that originally described by the researchers involved in the original questionnaire. It is concluded that GHQ-28 is suitable to explore prevalence of psychopathologies in emergency contexts and social isolation for general non-psychiatric population.

Perceived Occupational Stressors and the General Health of Critical Care Nurses During COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Higher scores indicate worse health. Various studies have confirmed the validity and reliability of this tool, with Cronbach's α more than 0.83 ( Ames-Guerreroa, 2021 ).…”

Is participation in antenatal classes associated with fathers' mental health? A quasi‐experimental and prospective study

“…2017), and the general population (Ames‐Guerrero et al. 2020). In the scoring system provided by Goldberg, a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 28 points can be obtained from the scale; higher scores indicate a higher possibility of a mental health disorder (Kılıç, 1996, 1997).…”

Estudios psicométricos de los instrumentos en español para la detección de trastornos mentales comunes: una revisión.

“…Para el GHQ-28 se ha encontrado un alfa de Cronbach entre 0,829 (18) y 0,955 (19); y las siguientes estructuras de 3 o 4 factores: a) Ansioso-somático, disfunción social y depresión (19). b) Depresión severa, ansiedad/insomnio, síntomas somáticos y disfunción social (18,20). c) Depresión severa, disturbios del sueño, síntomas somáticos y disfunción social (21).…”