2020
DOI: 10.1177/1078390320953896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Evaluation of the TIC Grade, a Self-Report Measure to Assess Youth Perceptions of the Quality of Trauma-Informed Care They Received

Abstract: Background Agencies and clinical practices are beginning to provide trauma-informed care (TIC) to their clients. However, there are no measures to assess clients’ perceptions of and satisfaction with the TIC care they have received. A 20-item questionnaire, the TIC Grade, was developed, based on the National Center for Trauma-Informed Care principles of TIC, to assess the patient or client perception of the TIC provided in settings that serve adolescents and emerging adults. Objective The goal of this project … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its broad conceptualization of TIC perceptions, as captured by Trauma-Informed Environment (Factor 1), captures several distinct aspects such as treatment progress, social support, resource availability, and crisis planning. This resembles a previous client-oriented instrument-the TIC Grade (Boucher et al, 2020)-and may indicate that clients experienced TIC holistically. This contrasts with the TRACE's and prior instruments' more specific TIC domains that distinguish between training and specific trauma related practices (e.g., trauma screening and crisis planning).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its broad conceptualization of TIC perceptions, as captured by Trauma-Informed Environment (Factor 1), captures several distinct aspects such as treatment progress, social support, resource availability, and crisis planning. This resembles a previous client-oriented instrument-the TIC Grade (Boucher et al, 2020)-and may indicate that clients experienced TIC holistically. This contrasts with the TRACE's and prior instruments' more specific TIC domains that distinguish between training and specific trauma related practices (e.g., trauma screening and crisis planning).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…However, prior instruments typically focus on client or staff perceptions independently. This study not only contributes to an underdeveloped but growing body of literature intent on adding client perceptions to measurements of TIC (Boucher et al, 2020; Goodman et al, 2016; Sinko et al, 2020) but also allows for research into congruence or disagreement between youth and staff. By these means, measuring TIC using responses from both perspectives provides a more holistic understanding of organizational culture and can yield insight into potential issues such as poor TIC implantation fidelity that produce perception differences between clients and staff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CYAB's collaboration contributed to content validity for the resulting 20-item TIC Grade measure. The TIC Grade has since then been used by community partner organizations, and the forms have been used for psychometric assessment (Boucher et al, 2020). This measure has strong potential to fill an important gap in providing a means to represent youth service user's voices and perceptions to evaluate TIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article reports the first step in a two-step project to collaborate with youth in the community to create a measure with strong content validity and then to psychometrically test this evaluation measure. A companion article (Boucher et al, 2020) also appears in this issue focusing on the psychometric testing across a handful of service organizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%