2021
DOI: 10.1080/10911359.2020.1854142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric evaluation of the Portuguese version of the FCV-19 scale and assessment of fear of COVID-19 in a Southern Brazilian population

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate and validate the Portuguese version of the Fear of and also to investigate the association of sociodemographic variables with the FCV-19S scores recorded in a sample of 3,495 women and 1,143 men recruited through a crosssectional online survey in the population of the State of Parana, Southern Brazil. The statistical analysis indicated that the Portuguese version of the FCV-19S has a unidimensional structure with robust psychometric properties. Besides, the mean score comparison a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its internal consistency reliability (ordinal alpha of 0.90 and Cronbach's alpha of 0.87) was slightly higher than that reported by Ahorsu et al 8 (Cronbach's alpha of 0.82). The unidimensionality was consistent with several other studies, 10,11,[13][14][15]18,20,23,24,29,30 including three conducted with the Brazilian Portuguese-speaking population 33,35,36 and one African study conducted with the Ethiopian Amharic-speaking population. 31 In the present study, Mozambicans had an overall average fear score of 20.5 (SD = 5.8), which was lower than that reported in the Ethiopian study (21.65, SD = 5.58, for those living in the country, and 20.79, SD = 5.78, for those not living in the country).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Its internal consistency reliability (ordinal alpha of 0.90 and Cronbach's alpha of 0.87) was slightly higher than that reported by Ahorsu et al 8 (Cronbach's alpha of 0.82). The unidimensionality was consistent with several other studies, 10,11,[13][14][15]18,20,23,24,29,30 including three conducted with the Brazilian Portuguese-speaking population 33,35,36 and one African study conducted with the Ethiopian Amharic-speaking population. 31 In the present study, Mozambicans had an overall average fear score of 20.5 (SD = 5.8), which was lower than that reported in the Ethiopian study (21.65, SD = 5.58, for those living in the country, and 20.79, SD = 5.78, for those not living in the country).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Before applying the FCV-19S, Mozambican researchers revised the Portuguese version validated in Brazil. [33][34][35][36] The response for the items of the FCV-19S was recorded following a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The participant's overall fear score corresponds to the sum of the seven items' scores and varies from 7 to 35.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this regard, Ahorsu et al (2020) recently developed the Fear of , to briefly assess the fear of COVID-19. The FCV-19S was translated into different languages and has been shown to have adequate psychometric evidence of validity and reliability (Alyami et al, 2020;Andrade et al, 2020;Bitan et al, 2020;Broche-P erez et al, 2020;Caycho-Rodr ıguez et al, 2020Elemo et al, 2020;Giordani et al, 2020;Haktanir et al, 2020;Huarcaya-Victoria et al, 2020;Mahmood et al, 2020;Mart ınez-Lorca et al, 2020;Masuyama et al, 2020;Pang et al, 2020;Perz et al, 2020;Reznik et al, 2020;Sakib et al, 2020;Soraci et al, 2020;St anculescu, 2021;Tsipropoulou et al, 2020;Wakashima et al, 2020). However, many of these investigations have concluded that the FCV-19S has a one factor structure, while others report the presence of two factors related to physiological and emotional responses to the fear of COVID-19 (Bitan et al, 2020;Caycho-Rodr ıguez et al, 2020Huarcaya-Victoria et al, 2020;Masuyama et al, 2020;Reznik et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%