Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire (HDFQ) in people with diabetes in Iran

Khanjari, Sedigheh; Tehrani, Fereshteh Javaheri; Feinn, Richard; Wagner, Julie; Abedini, Zahra

doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102563

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Whether items will be retained depends on their factor load. Items will be deleted if their factor loadings are <0.3; between 0.3 and 0.6, acceptable; above 0.6, good (Khanjari et al., 2022 ).…”

Section: The Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Chinese version of the ‘caring ability of family caregivers of patients with cancer scale (CAFCPCS)’ in family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer: A study protocol

Zhuang,

Wang,

Chen

et al. 2024

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimThis study aims to translate the English version of the ‘caring ability of family caregivers of patients with cancer scale (CAFCPCS)’ into Chinese and validate its psychometric properties in the family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer.DesignA methodological study.MethodsBased on the Brislin translation model, the original scale will be translated and back‐translated, the Delphi expert consultation method will be adopted for cross‐cultural adaptation, and the pilot will be carried out in 20–30 family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer. Then, a dual‐centre prospective study will be conducted by recruiting 371–542 family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer to validate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CAFCPCS.ResultsThe scale's content validity will be evaluated using the Delphi expert inquiry method, and the face validity will be evaluated using a pre‐experiment. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) will be used to assess structural validity, while internal consistency reliability and split‐half reliability will be used to assess reliability.Patient or Public ContributionPublic involvement is of great significance for this study. Participants will be used in a pre‐test to give feedback on whether the contents of the clinical pilot version of CAFCPCS after expert consultation can reflect real problems and whether the sentences can be well understood. Based on their opinions, the research group will further refine the scale.

show abstract

Section: The Studymentioning

confidence: 99%