2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal needs questionnaire in the Indonesian language

Abstract: Suicide remains one of the leading causes of death among youths and the commonly reported associated risk factor is interpersonal needs, which consists of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. To date, there is no validated interpersonal needs questionnaire in Indonesia. Therefore, this research aims to validate and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ-15) among adolescents and young adults in the Indonesian language. Based on the results, the INQ-15… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The questionnaire consisted of 6 questions on the Perceived Burdensomeness subscale and 9 on the Thwarted Burdensomeness subscale. The participants were asked to rate the responses using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 7 consisting of “not at all true for me” to “very true for me.” Both models of the Indonesian INQ validated by Pandia et al, 24 had a good fit to the data with a good concurrent and discriminant validity when compared to other instruments. It also has a high internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of .91.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The questionnaire consisted of 6 questions on the Perceived Burdensomeness subscale and 9 on the Thwarted Burdensomeness subscale. The participants were asked to rate the responses using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 7 consisting of “not at all true for me” to “very true for me.” Both models of the Indonesian INQ validated by Pandia et al, 24 had a good fit to the data with a good concurrent and discriminant validity when compared to other instruments. It also has a high internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of .91.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 81%