2001
DOI: 10.1300/j018v23n03_06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Evaluation of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)

Abstract: Depression in the older adult is frequently under-diagnosed and under-treated in the health care setting resulting in increased mortality in the elderly. When the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is administered in combination with other diagnostic evaluations, however, it provides a reliable, valid, and cost-effective depression screening for the elderly. This paper provides psychometric evidence of the efficacy of the GDS, outlines the magnitude of the problems faced among healthcare professionals in assessi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GDS has been found to have adequate psychometric properties. 36 Self-and collateral reports of ADLs were examined with the OARS. 37 Each questionnaire contains 15 items assessing OAs' ability to perform ADLs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GDS has been found to have adequate psychometric properties. 36 Self-and collateral reports of ADLs were examined with the OARS. 37 Each questionnaire contains 15 items assessing OAs' ability to perform ADLs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following admission to the program, the HAM-D is readministered monthly and the GDS is readministered once, at discharge. The GDS assesses the presence or absence of 30 depressive symptoms; a cut-off score of 11 indicates depression and scores above 20 are considered severe (Peach et al, 2001;Yesavage and Brink, 1983). The HAM-D assesses the severity of symptoms; various cut scores ranging from 15 to 18 indicate significant depression and a score of 7 typically signifies remission (Entsuah et al, 2001;Hamilton, 1960;Zimmerman et al, 2002).…”
Section: Intake and Outcome Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a highly reliable and valid instrument that allows early detection of significant mood changes and, therefore, better management of depression-related adverse consequences (Peach, Koob, & Kraus, 2001). The GDS is a time-saving instrument with a simple response format (yes/no), which facilitates its use in different healthcare settings (Jongenelis et al, 2005;Peach et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%