2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11469-021-00668-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Evaluation of the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale: One- or Two-Factor Solution?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors reported a unidimensional structure of the scale. However, they suggested that the BFAS may cover two factors, stressing that non-specificity of item 3 implies that mood modification may not be a mandatory symptom of behavioral addiction in their healthy sample [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors reported a unidimensional structure of the scale. However, they suggested that the BFAS may cover two factors, stressing that non-specificity of item 3 implies that mood modification may not be a mandatory symptom of behavioral addiction in their healthy sample [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the one-factor model exhibited misfit in some studies, which was remedied by allowing some residuals to correlate [ 20 , 24 , 42 ]. Suboptimal loadings for few items are also reported [ 47 ]. Investigations of invariance of the BFAS across different groups are few, and the results are inconsistent denoting invariance [ 43 ] or minimal non-invariance across gender groups [ 42 ] and varying levels of non-invariance across groups of age [ 42 , 43 ] and academic achievement [ 43 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%