1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-8868-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjects had been informed that they would be making multiple ratings, although the exact number was unspecified. The rating was made by placing a mark on a visual analog pain scale (Eggebrecht, Bautz, Brening, Pfingsten, & Franz, 1989), which is a 13-mm horizontal line anchored with pain as severe as it could be at the left pole and no pain at the right. The words severe, moderate, and slight extended left-to-right below the entire length of the vector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects had been informed that they would be making multiple ratings, although the exact number was unspecified. The rating was made by placing a mark on a visual analog pain scale (Eggebrecht, Bautz, Brening, Pfingsten, & Franz, 1989), which is a 13-mm horizontal line anchored with pain as severe as it could be at the left pole and no pain at the right. The words severe, moderate, and slight extended left-to-right below the entire length of the vector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numeric rating scales were used to assess pain severity and distress. The items were composed of 13-point Likert-type rating scales (based on Eggebrecht, Bautz, Brening, Pfingsten, & Franz, 1989). Descriptors ranged from 0 = none at all to 13 = extreme .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%