Psychometric characteristics of the Croatian and the Serbian versions of the oral health impact profile for edentulous subjects, with a pilot study on the dimensionality

Čelebić, Asjâ; Stančić, Ivica; Kovačić, Ines; Popovac, Aleksandra; Topić, Jolanda; Mehulić, Ketij; Elencevski, Saso; Peršić, Sanja

doi:10.2478/sjph-2021-0009

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 43 publications

(36 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, we designed a clinical prospective cross-over study based on dental patient self-reported measures, i.e., OHRQoL and OES. The OHIP-EDENT questionnaire has already been psychometrically validated in many countries and languages and was a logical choice for assessing OHRQoL for edentulous patients ( 28 , 30 - 33 ). After the first day of new denture wearing, the OHIP EDENT scores gradually increased through the 3 rd and the 8 th day and then gradually decreased (the 15 th day) and reached the lowest values after 30 days in both groups.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One day after the new CD or MDI-OD delivery, the patients had to fill in data about gender, age, and their previous dental status [fixed partial denture or natural teeth (FPD); removable partial denture (RPD)]. They also had to fill in the validated questionnaires, i.e., the OHIP-EDENT questionnaire consisting of 19 questions ( 28 ) and the orofacial esthetic scale (OES), consisting of eight questions ( 29 ). The OHIP-EDENT comprised 19 questions with answers from 0 (without problems) to 4 (maximum problems).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Adaptation to New Dentures and 5 Years of Clinical Use: A Comparison between Complete Denture and Mini-implant Mandibular Overdenture Patients based on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) and Orofacial Esthetics

Topić¹,

Poljak-Guberina²,

Peršić-Kiršić³

et al. 2022

Acta Stomatol Croat

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective of work It is unclear how long patients need to adapt to new dentures. This study assessed adaptation and five years of clinical use, comparing complete denture wearers (CDs) and mini-implant mandibular overdenture wearers opposing a maxillary CD (MDI-OD), based on oral health reported quality of life (OHRQoL) and orofacial esthetics (OES). Material and Methods A total of 36 subjects in the CD group (25 females) and 30 subjects in the MDI group (20 females) completed the 5-year study. All patients received new CDs, but in the MDI-OD group, four mini-implants were inserted interforaminally in the mandible before denture manufacture. Participants filled in the OHIP-EDENT and OES questionnaires one day after dentures’ delivery, on the 3 rd , 8 th , 15 th , 30 th day, and at the 1-, 3- and 5-year follow-up examinations. Statistical analysis comprised descriptive methods, X 2 test, independent t-test, Friedman, and Mann-Whitney test. Results and Conclusions Both groups' adaptation to new dentures was completed within a month. The MDI-OD group had significantly better OHRQoL in all follow-ups except for the 3 rd and 8 th day, probably due to soreness and pain, the reason why the MDI-OD group had limitation in functioning in the first days after new dentures’ delivery. Already after the third year and at the fifth year, OHRQoL worsened (p<0.01) in both groups. However it was significantly more pronounced in the conventional CD wearers (p<0.01) than in the MDI-OD group. Orofacial esthetics was highly scored in both groups. The scores dropped down only after three years, equally in both groups. Keywords OHRQoL, OES, prospective study, complete dentures, mini-implants, adaptation MeSH Terms Complete Dentures; Dental Implants; Quality of Life; Dental Esthetics

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptation to New Dentures and 5 Years of Clinical Use: A Comparison between Complete Denture and Mini-implant Mandibular Overdenture Patients based on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) and Orofacial Esthetics

Topić¹,

Poljak-Guberina²,

Peršić-Kiršić³

et al. 2022

Acta Stomatol Croat

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Orofacial esthetics is one of the most important factors in oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) of dental patients ( 17 - 21 ). The appearance of teeth, gums, and jaws is restored and changed by a large number of restorative, prosthodontic, periodontal, orthodontic and other oral interventions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Orofacial Esthetics among Different Specialists in Dental Medicine: A pilot study

Prica¹,

Čelebić²,

Kovačić³

et al. 2022

Acta Stomatol Croat

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Little is known whether specialists in different dental fields assess orofacial esthetics differently due to various focus of their interest. The aim was to find out if there is a difference in judgement of orofacial esthetics among specialists in three different fields of Dental Medicine, i.e. specialists in Prosthodontics (S-Prosthod), Periodontology (S-Perio), and Orthodontics (S-Ortho). Material and methods A total of 69 specialists (23 participants in each group) assessed the same 60 photographs of the lower third of the face of young healthy people with Angle Class I and natural teeth while smiling. Moreover, the assessed anterior teeth on the photographs of similes had to be without any restorations. The assessments were made using 7 out of 8 Items of Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES). A face profile assessment was not performed. A Likert 1-5 scale was used for assessments (1-the worst score; 5-the best score). Mean values of summary scores as well as of each OES item were calculated for each specialist for further statistical analysis. One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and Sheffe post-hoc tests were performed. Results The specialists in Periodontology gave significantly lowest scores to all 7 items related to orofacial esthetics, while the specialists in Prosthodontics gave the highest scores (p<0.05). Conclusion Assessments of orofacial esthetics differ significantly among specialists in Prosthodontics, Periodontology and Orthodontics. Further study is needed to clarify the factors which influence the judgement, and to find out if specific education in certain specialties can modify the assessment.

show abstract

“…The OHIP-EDENT-19 is proved to be a precise, reliable and useful valid tool for assessing the quality of life related to oral health. 41 The frequency of oral problems is evaluated by OHIP-EDENT-19, which also provides a profile of how these problems might influence a subject's life.…”

Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The OHIP‐EDENT‐19 questionnaire is a 19 question, easy‐to‐use and trustworthy tool for assessing oral health‐related quality of life. The OHIP‐EDENT‐19 is proved to be a precise, reliable and useful valid tool for assessing the quality of life related to oral health 41 . The frequency of oral problems is evaluated by OHIP‐EDENT‐19, which also provides a profile of how these problems might influence a subject's life.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient satisfaction and oral health‐related quality of life for four implant‐assisted mandibular overdentures fabricated with CAD/CAM milled poly methyl methacrylate, CAD/CAM‐milled poly ether ether ketone, or conventional poly methyl methacrylate: A crossover clinical trial

Gomaa

Mostafa

El-Shaheed

2023

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background New materials for overdenture base construction were evolved. Thus, more clinical trials are needed to validate these materials. Objective This study aimed to compare the difference between CAD/CAM‐milled poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA), poly ether ether ketone (PEEK) and conventional mandibular implant‐assisted overdentures regarding patient satisfaction and oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQL). Methods This randomised, crossover, clinical study included 18 completely edentulous subjects rehabilitated with three mandibular implant‐assisted overdentures with three different denture base materials opposing a maxillary single denture. These materials were as follows: CAD/CAM‐milled PMMA, CAD/CAM‐milled PEEK and conventional PMMA. Every participant first received each mandibular overdenture in a random manner. After 6 months of each overdenture use, patient satisfaction and oral health‐related quality of life were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP‐EDENT‐19), respectively, and then crossover to other groups was done. The same was repeated to the last group. Comparison of VAS and OHIP‐EDENT‐19 between groups was done using Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Bonferroni test. Results Regarding all the VAS items, there were statistically significant higher scores for CAD/CAM‐milled PMMA and PEEK than conventional PMMA base except for speech, aesthetic and smell. Regarding OHIP‐EDENT‐19, many items revealed statistically lower problem scores for CAD/CAM‐milled PMMA, and CAD/CAM‐milled PEEK than conventional PMMA base except psychological discomfort, psychological disability and social disability. Conclusion Within the limit of this study, CAD/CAM‐milled PMMA and CAD/CAM‐milled PEEK were recommended as implant‐assisted overdenture bases as it revealed higher patient satisfaction and better oral health‐related quality of life in comparison with conventional PMMA implant‐assisted overdenture.

show abstract

Psychometric characteristics of the Croatian and the Serbian versions of the oral health impact profile for edentulous subjects, with a pilot study on the dimensionality

Cited by 4 publications

References 43 publications

Adaptation to New Dentures and 5 Years of Clinical Use: A Comparison between Complete Denture and Mini-implant Mandibular Overdenture Patients based on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) and Orofacial Esthetics

Adaptation to New Dentures and 5 Years of Clinical Use: A Comparison between Complete Denture and Mini-implant Mandibular Overdenture Patients based on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) and Orofacial Esthetics

Assessment of Orofacial Esthetics among Different Specialists in Dental Medicine: A pilot study

Patient satisfaction and oral health‐related quality of life for four implant‐assisted mandibular overdentures fabricated with CAD/CAM milled poly methyl methacrylate, CAD/CAM‐milled poly ether ether ketone, or conventional poly methyl methacrylate: A crossover clinical trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About