2019
DOI: 10.1177/0300891619868284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric assessment of the Italian version of the melanoma module (SCNS-M12-Ita) of the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34)

Abstract: Introduction: This study examines the validity and the reliability of the translated-into-Italian version of the SCNS-SF34 melanoma module (SCNS-M12-Ita) for a sample of patients with melanoma ( n = 268). Methods: Content validity was analyzed by examining the redundancy of items. Floor/ceiling effects were investigated via frequency tables. Factor structure was studied through principal component analysis. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach α. Test–retest reliability was analyzed using intraclas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exploratory factor analysis (EFA, principal component analysis with varimax rotation) was used for the examination of factor validity. To test the suitability of the data for EFA, The Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's tests were used to identify the sample adequacy and appropriateness of sample size respectively [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Exploratory factor analysis (EFA, principal component analysis with varimax rotation) was used for the examination of factor validity. To test the suitability of the data for EFA, The Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's tests were used to identify the sample adequacy and appropriateness of sample size respectively [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a similar methodology for the assessment of convergent validity used in other studies in other countries for the assessment of convergent validity [29,30,31]. The differences of other studies where convergent validity was assessed by comparing with previously validated Questionnaire in the similar language "30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ) Core Questionnaire, The 25-item EORTC QLQ information module, the 14-itemHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), The 10-item Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS)" [6,14,18,9]. While in a study done in Turkey, the author had not mentioned about convergent validity [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Test-retest reliability was analyzed using intra-class correlation coe cients (ICC). An ICC value of 0.70 or above was considered satisfactory [26]. Pretesting done among 34 respondents (10% of sample size=340) for the assessment Reliability and construct validity.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%