Psychometric Analysis of a Scale to Assess Norms of Reciprocity of Social Support in Community-Based and Congregation-Based Groups

Abstract

Reciprocity, a core component of social capital, is rarely theorized or measured leaving the relationship between reciprocity and health ambiguous. Historically, reciprocity measures have not been used in the context they were designed causing measurement error. This multi-phased study was designed to develop and validate a reciprocity measure for formal and informal groups within communities and congregations as part of a more comprehensive social capital measure. In-depth interviews (n = 72), cognitive interviews (n = 40), and an expert review panel guided item development and selection for content validity. South Carolina residents (n = 500) completed the 10-item Reciprocity of Social Support (RSS) Scale during 2008-2010. Construct validity was supported through an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) that confirmed a two-factor model for the scale for community-and congregation-based groups. Cronbach's α values indicated items were highly correlated for community groups and church groups. Psychometric analyses of the RSS Scale support convergent and divergent validity for the community-and congregation-based groups. Mean RSS Scale scores were not statistically different between communityand congregation-based groups. This scale has proven psychometric properties for utilization in future research investigating reciprocity of social support in community-and congregation-based groups and will be useful to examine whether reciprocity (by context and type of group) is associated with physical and/or mental health. Keywordsresearch methods, social sciences, data collection, research methodology and design, reliability and validity, measurement and scaling methods, health psychology, applied psychology, psychology, sociology of mental health, sociology of health and illness by guest on June 4, 2016 Downloaded from

An Evaluation of a Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy mHealth-Supported Intervention to Reduce Loneliness in Older People

“…Edwards [56], following Putnam’s various propositions in relation to social capital, states that trust is foundational to civic culture and is the outcome of a person’s correct prediction of others’ co-operative behavior, facilitated by external conditions. In addition, Pope et al [57] note that the higher the level of trust, the greater the possibility of social participation. Because Mistrust is linked to social loneliness it may also be interwoven with the schema of Defectiveness leading to feelings of shame, inadequacy, and hypersensitivity to criticism that hamper trust and relationship development.…”

“…Because Mistrust is linked to social loneliness it may also be interwoven with the schema of Defectiveness leading to feelings of shame, inadequacy, and hypersensitivity to criticism that hamper trust and relationship development. A further possible factor relates to socio-emotional selectivity theory, according to which older people select to maintain contact with their closest, familiar relationships [57] rather than building new relationships [58,59]. Lastly, delayed changes in social loneliness, may be related to South Africa being a country with low levels of trust [54] and with older people showing lower trust levels than younger people [55].…”

Religious and Spiritual Growth Goals: A Forgotten Outcome

“…Our measures of social exchanges focused exclusively on social interactions with other people. We did not ask participants to specify whether these social partners were members of one's religious community, which may have important implications for well-being (Bishop, 2008;Pope et al, 2013). In addition, there is a strong literature demonstrating that many adults seek a personal relationship with a deity (e.g., Kirkpatrick, 2005).…”

“…Thus, problematic relationships within one's community may be a source of stress and may result in loss of support (Henrie & Patrick, 2014;Krause et al, 2018). Moreover, one's church community may be a unique source of social support, characterized by reciprocity (Kirkpatrick, 2005;Pope et al, 2013).…”

Designing Organizations for Collaborative Relationships: the Amenability of Social Capital to Inter-Agency Collaboration in the Graduate Employment Context in Uganda

“…It measures the extent to which organizations reciprocate their relationships. We measured it according to the tools developed by Pope et al ( 2013 ). These were 10 items that were developed through psychometric processes from a religious-based perspective.…”