1995
DOI: 10.1177/008124639502500406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychology's Subject

Abstract: In this article the author aims to highlight or spotlight psychology's subject, that is, who (or perhaps even what) psychology purports to inquire about. I will show how the milestones in modern psychological thinking constitute psychology's subject and note the absence of the lived-body and our historicity in theories of the person.• Die doel van die artikel is om die subjek van sielkunde te belig, dit is, wie (of miskien selfs wat) die sielkunde aanvoer dit bestudeer. Ek sal wys hoe die mylpale in modeme sie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rorty would like us to give up a quest for grounds, a theory of knowledge and other such 'conversation stoppers' and move onto something more worthwhile such as drawing together in conversation about how to cope. Whether this is even a tenable move given the very groundlessness of our positions according to Rorty is not at issue here (Craig, 1995(Craig, , 1997. I do, however, want to consider certain milestones in the debate about knowing and knowledge from Descartes to the present, because these inform our discussion of what it is to have knowledge.…”
Section: What Is It That We 'Have' When We Have Knowledge?mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rorty would like us to give up a quest for grounds, a theory of knowledge and other such 'conversation stoppers' and move onto something more worthwhile such as drawing together in conversation about how to cope. Whether this is even a tenable move given the very groundlessness of our positions according to Rorty is not at issue here (Craig, 1995(Craig, , 1997. I do, however, want to consider certain milestones in the debate about knowing and knowledge from Descartes to the present, because these inform our discussion of what it is to have knowledge.…”
Section: What Is It That We 'Have' When We Have Knowledge?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In what follows I foreground our bodiliness, other-relatedness and selfrelatedness as three aspects of our identities and, as such, the three faces of a non-psychic conception of ourselves-a conception which invites both science and stories to the game of life. I believe that it is through the interlinking of our bodiliness, other-relatedness (or sociability) and selfrelatedness (or personhood) that our dynamic identities as unique individuals are established and maintained (this is also taken up in Craig, 1995Craig, , 1997Craig, , 1998. Of the three, we give our bodiliness the lion's share because it is through our bodiliness that we are literally placed separated from each other and singly in a particular way in the world: to know and be known.…”
Section: A Non-psychic Conception Of Ourselvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation