Psychology, Causality, and Court

Kane, Andrew W.

doi:10.1007/0-387-25610-5_2

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Specificity is the ability of a measure to identify individuals for whom the condition is not present. The hit rate is the total proportion of accurately identified cases, i.e., the true positives plus the true negatives (14–16). PPP is the percentage of individuals detected as malingering who are actually malingering, while the NPP is the percentage of honest individuals (17, 18).…”

Section: Current Assessments Of Malingeringmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Approaches to Detecting Malingering in Forensic Contexts and Promising Cognitive Load-Inducing Lie Detection Techniques

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Malingering, the feigning of psychological or physical ailment for gain, imposes high costs on society, especially on the criminal-justice system. In this article, we review some of the costs of malingering in forensic contexts. Then the most common methods of malingering detection are reviewed, including those for feigned psychiatric and cognitive impairments. The shortcomings of each are considered. The article continues with a discussion of commonly used means for detecting deception. Although not traditionally used to uncover malingering, new, innovative methods are emphasized that attempt to induce greater cognitive load on liars than truth tellers, some informed by theoretical accounts of deception. As a type of deception, we argue that such cognitive approaches and theoretical understanding can be adapted to the detection of malingering to supplement existing methods.

show abstract

Section: Current Assessments Of Malingeringmentioning

confidence: 99%