Psychology and the Notion of the Spirit: Implications of Max Scheler’s Anthropological Philosophy in Theory of Psychology

Abstract

After many decades with neglect Max Scheler and his anthropological contributions to the understanding of human existence, have gotten more attention in psychology and other humanities. One factor is the actuality of his main project of revaluating the roles of values in philosophy and science. Yet another is the way individual scholars have applied Scheler's philosophy and terms on different fields and arenas. Viktor Frankl was one of these, and he brought Scheler's philosophical anthropology into psychotherapeutic practice, offering theoretical and empirical arguments for considering the notion of the spirit as an interdependent -yet separate- entity in regards to the psyche and the soma. During this commentary on Allyushin (Integrative Psychology Behaviour, 48, 503-523, 2014), we will discuss some general aspects of Scheler's contribution to phenomenology, but focus specifically on the implication of his notion of the spirit for psychological theory, acknowledging the work that has been done in the field for at least 60 years in logotherapy and existential analysis. With this purpose, we will highlight four other notions interrelated with the motivational quality of the notion of the spirit: resentment, axiology of values; self-detachment and self-transcendence.

The meaning of life and health – a comparative study of the concepts of Aaron Antonovsky and Viktor Frankl

“…Using the philosophical anthropology of Max Scheler, Frankl found theoretical and empirical arguments for considering the phenomenon of spirituality as a being separate from the body and psyche (Lehman, Klempe, 2015). The bio-psychological dimension of human functioning is the basis of existence, but its formation is subjectively incomplete, being in some way closed by biological and environmental determinism.…”

Revisiting “The Art of Being Fragile”: Why cultural psychology needs literature and poetry

“…It is not the first time that the existential, the ethical, the axiological, and the spiritual are placed together in the history of philosophy, anthropology, or psychology. Max Scheler is a great example the potential of such an integration, in order to better understand processes of meaning-making, decision-making, and their cultural guidance (Lehmann & Klempe, 2015). Cultural psychology could profit from exploring these arenas in the verses yet to be written in their theories.…”