2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01681.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychologists, Race, and Housing in Postwar America

Abstract: Housing in postwar America became a critical focal point for issues of race and social equality. Housing and race relations became a real‐world laboratory for psychologists and other social scientists, including several of the leaders of Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, to examine developing theories of intergroup relations, especially as potential means to reduce prejudice. Further, it is argued that psychologists sought to impact emerging housing policy and to ameliorate an enduring soci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such samples differ compared with developing countries, for example, with regard to demographics (Arnett, 2008), fairness (Nowak et al, 2000), or risk aversion (Henrich & McElreath, 2002), which is why it not self-evident that studies based on such samples show globally applicable validity. However, it is not only the selection of samples that imposes limitations but also the fact that the researchers themselves are mostly from WEIRD countries, which may limit the interpretive structures that can be applied to the results (see, for example, Harris, 1998; O’Connor, 2001; Pickren, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such samples differ compared with developing countries, for example, with regard to demographics (Arnett, 2008), fairness (Nowak et al, 2000), or risk aversion (Henrich & McElreath, 2002), which is why it not self-evident that studies based on such samples show globally applicable validity. However, it is not only the selection of samples that imposes limitations but also the fact that the researchers themselves are mostly from WEIRD countries, which may limit the interpretive structures that can be applied to the results (see, for example, Harris, 1998; O’Connor, 2001; Pickren, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%