1985
DOI: 10.1037/h0080034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychologists and privileged communication.

Abstract: For many Canadian psychologists the distinction between confidentiality and privileged communication is unclear. For instance, many mistakenly believe that they are able to promise absolute confidentiality to their clients. The misconceptions can, in part, be attributed to the absence of any clear legal guidelines concerning privileged communication. A discretionary approach to granting privileges based on Wigmore's rules could This paper was funded in part by Grant No. 452-836198 from the Social Sciences and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Canadian law regarding privilege has been formulated by the legal experts and does not recognize privilege between psychologists and their clients. In future, psychologists should use their special research skills to help influence legal decisions regarding professional privilege (Ryan & Bagby, 1985). The Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists (CPA, 1986) was developed by CPA to guide the professional behaviour of psychologists in Canada.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canadian law regarding privilege has been formulated by the legal experts and does not recognize privilege between psychologists and their clients. In future, psychologists should use their special research skills to help influence legal decisions regarding professional privilege (Ryan & Bagby, 1985). The Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists (CPA, 1986) was developed by CPA to guide the professional behaviour of psychologists in Canada.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%