Psychological Treatments for Mental Disorders in Children and Adolescents: A Review of the Evidence of Leading International Organizations

Abstract

In recent decades, the evidence on psychological treatments for children and adolescents has increased considerably. Several organizations have proposed different criteria to evaluate the evidence of psychological treatment in this age group. The aim of this study was to analyze evidence-based treatments drawn from RCTs, reviews, meta-analyses, guides and lists provided by four leading international organizations. The institutions reviewed were the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (Division 53) of the American Psychological Association, Cochrane Collaboration and the Australian Psychological Society in relation to mental disorders in children and adolescents. A total of 137 treatments were analyzed for 17 mental disorders and compared to determine the level of agreement among the organizations. The results indicate that, in most cases, there is little agreement among organizations and that there are several discrepancies within certain disorders. These results require reflection on the meaning attributed to evidence-based treatments with regard to psychological treatments in children and adolescents. The possible reasons for these differences could be explained by a combination of different issues: the procedures or committees may be biased, different studies were reviewed, different criteria are used by the organizations or the reviews of existing evidence were conducted in different time periods.

Neuropsychological deficits in internalizing and externalizing disorders

“…Among the treatments with the most empirical support in the treatment of mental disorders for children and adolescents are those with a cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational approach, which is considered the first-line treatment (Bekker et al, 2017). However, the effect sizes on outcomes are smaller compared to other interventions: between small and medium for depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, medium for anxiety, and large for OCD (David et al, 2018;Galvez-Lara et al, 2018); there is a considerable percentage of children and adolescents who do not benefit from the interventions (i.e., between 30-40% for the treatment of childhood anxiety disorders according to Sandin et al, 2018) and the limited scope of psychotherapy (Jorm et al, 2017).…”

Editorial Promoting Help-seeking using E-Technology for ADolescents: The ProHEAD consortium

“…The growing literature on evidence-based care for mental illness in children and adolescents convincingly documents that professional treatment leads to lasting benefits and full recovery in many youth (e.g. [3, 4]). Early intervention may improve the long-term prognosis and reduce the risk of chronic courses of illness (e.g.…”

Evidence-Based Brief Psychological Treatment for Emotional Disorders in Primary and Specialized Care: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Despite the importance of evaluating the efficacy of psychological treatments (Moriana et al, 2017; Gálvez-Lara et al, 2018), the knowledge of the empirical research’s results and its later integration by the professional in the clinical practice does not get to consolidate completely in the applied fields (Herbert, 2003; Kazdin, 2008, 2011; Barlow et al, 2013). In this line, some studies have evidenced that psychologist, often, do not use evidence-based treatment (Lilienfeld, 2010; Dobson and Beshai, 2013; Dozois, 2013).…”