1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00844816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological, situational, and gender predictors of cardiovascular reactivity to stress: A multivariate approach

Abstract: This study examined whether relationships between anger expression, hostility, social evaluative anxiety, and a presumed mechanism for coronary heart disease development, cardiovascular reactivity (CVR) to stress, are moderated by stress situation and gender and whether such relationships are attenuated by inadequate assessments. Subjects (47 men, 47 women) were assigned randomly to either a Harassment or a Social Evaluation condition, under which they performed a reaction time task. SBP, DBP, and HR measures … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study, like others, notes the importance of anger or stressprovoking situations (e.g. Burns, 1995;Burns & Katkin, 1993;Suarez & Williams, 1990) to elicit the differential CVR responding, highlighting that repression effects are most apparent when social evaluative cues are pronounced (e.g. Newton & Contrada, 1992).…”
Section: Hostility Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This study, like others, notes the importance of anger or stressprovoking situations (e.g. Burns, 1995;Burns & Katkin, 1993;Suarez & Williams, 1990) to elicit the differential CVR responding, highlighting that repression effects are most apparent when social evaluative cues are pronounced (e.g. Newton & Contrada, 1992).…”
Section: Hostility Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Evidence indeed supports this notion. Findings show that individuals characterized by anger-hostility tend to show greater CVR during interpersonal harassment than during stress tasks which do not feature such anger-provocation (Burns and Katkin, 1993;Engebretson et aL, 1989;Hardy and Smith, 1988;Williams, 1989, 1990). Trait x situation interactions also may be pertinent for links between traits of anxiety and CVR to stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Individuals high and low on traits have been subjected to Manipulation versus Control conditions (e.g., Suarez and Williams, 1989) or Manipulation versus Manipulation conditions (e.g., Burns and Katkin, 1993); both alternatives have provided only limited comparisons of associations between traits and CVR across various situations. The present study expanded the investigation of the trait • situation ap-proach by employing two distinct manipulations and a control condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Females alone were chosen because males and females vary in terms of the types of stimuli that they respond to as stressors in terms of life events [9] and experimental challenges [10]. They also have different psychosocial [9] and physiological [10] responses to the same stressors and it is believed that the integrity of their stress responses is not associated with the same personality variables [11][12]. In addition, in the w20 yrs-of-age category, females appear to be at greater risk from asthma, since they report For editorial comments see page 574.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%