Psychological Resilience in the Context of Disability: A Study With Turkish and Moroccan Young-Old Immigrants Living in the Netherlands

Abstract

Background and Objectives The disability paradox postulates that some individuals with severe functional limitations demonstrate psychological resilience, that is, good mental health and quality of life. Resilience to disabilities has been linked to psychological (e.g., mastery) and social factors (e.g., social provisions). It is, however, less clear whether cultural factors can provide additional resources for resilience building in older immigrants. We investigated the extent to which sociodemographic, psychosocial, and cultural factors contributed to psychological resilience to disabilities among immigrants of Turkish and Moroccan descent in the Netherlands. Research Design and Method The sample included 478 older immigrants aged 55–65 years. Data were analyzed using latent profile analysis and multinomial logistic regressions. Results Five categories were identified: (a) High physical and emotional functioning; (b) High physical but poor emotional functioning; (c) Low physical but high emotional functioning (resilient); (d) Low physical and emotional functioning; and (e) Low physical and very low emotional functioning. Resilient functioning (reference category) was associated with poorer Dutch language proficiency, lower levels of loneliness, greater mastery, and more religious coping. Discussion and Implications Findings provide support for the disability paradox and highlight social provisions, mastery, and religiosity/spirituality as important resources for psychological resilience in older labor migrants. Poor Dutch language proficiency is discussed as a potential factor contributing to severe functional limitations in the resilient category.

The Interplay Between Quality of Life and Resilience Factors in Later Life: A Network Analysis

“…One other important constraint to be aware of is the fact that our sample is represented by a predominantly highly educated, native-born group of older adults. This may impact the generalizability of our results, as both education level and migration history have been shown to affect (outcome based) resilience among older adults in a number of previous studies ( Lund et al, 2018 ; Klokgieters et al, 2020 ; Szabó et al, 2020 ). Hence, we encourage researchers to perform similar studies to reveal whether the pattern of associations of minority groups approximates the one observed in the current study.…”

Maintenance of high quality of life as an indicator of resilience during COVID-19 social distancing among community-dwelling older adults in Finland

“…Adversity was defined as illness, change in marital status to single, or transition into poverty, and resilience as bouncing back to the pre-adversity mental health level after adversity. In majority of studies among older adults, resilience has been studied as positive psychosocial functioning in the context of accumulating and persisting health adversities such as decreased physical functioning or disability [ 7 , 8 ], cognitive impairment [ 9 ], and caregiver stress [ 10 ]. Diversity in operationalizing resilience stems not only from differences in research questions and study designs, but also from challenges related to capturing adaptation processes, as the timing and types of adversities vary between individuals making it challenging to construct analytical models in observational studies.…”

How do acculturation strategies and psychosomatic health among Turkish voluntary and involuntary migrants worldwide interplay? A systematic review

“…In terms of both physical and emotional functioning, positive functioning was found to be associated with stability and security in the social and professional environment. Therefore, men who were financially well-off and successful showed higher physical and emotional functioning (Szabó, Klokgieters, Kok, van Tilburg & Huisman, 2019). According to Minas, Klimidis and Tuncer (2007), migration consistently influences an individual's perception and practice of their religion and associated beliefs which are closely related.…”