Abstract:One way in which intercountry adoptees can elaborate on their past history is through travelling to their country of birth. This article explores the memories and experiences recalled by a group of adoptees who visited their homeland after being adopted as children by Italian families. The sample comprised 34 participants aged between 12 and 40 years who visited their birth country between 2000 and 2013. In 2017–2018, they were asked to complete a questionnaire designed to obtain retrospective recall of their … Show more
“…However, results can be due to the small heterogeneous group, as some differences approached statistical significance, for example, LA adolescents showed higher attachment dismissal than COM peers with no difference with the residential care group in this type of insecurity. Therefore, researchers and professionals are invited to not stop to the absence of statistical difference with non‐adopted peers, maintaining clinical attention and long‐term attachment‐informed post‐adoptive monitoring in this group (Pace et al, 2018; Palacios et al, 2019; Santona et al, 2022, 2022), which may be still vulnerable as supposed not‐originally secure but developed‐secure in attachment after a positive adoption (Pace et al, 2019; Peñarrubia et al, 2022).…”
ObjectiveCompared to community adolescents (COM), adolescents placed in residential care (RC) or late adopted (LA) appear to show more emotional–behavioural problems. They also appear vulnerable in variables linked to emotional–behavioural problems, such as insecure–disorganized attachment and alexithymia. This study employs a mixed‐method multi‐informant approach to (1) compare adolescents placed in RC, LA and COM in emotional–behavioural problems, attachment and alexithymia and (2) investigate relationships and interplay of attachment and alexithymia concerning emotional–behavioural problems in these three groups.MethodParticipants were 174 adolescents (50 RC, 33 LA and 91 COM; Mage = 15, 53% boys and 47% girls). Adolescents' internalizing and externalizing problems were assessed through both caregiver‐reported and self‐reported questionnaires, while attachment and alexithymia were assessed with a mixed method, using interviews and self‐report questionnaires.ResultsThe results showed RC adolescents as more vulnerable in all variables, while LA and COM did not differ. Accounting for the group, attachment and alexithymia cumulatively predicted 25–43% of internalizing problems, and 19–43% of externalizing problems depending on the method of assessment or problems' informant (all p < 0.01). Alexithymia was both an independent predictor and interacted with preoccupied attachment in predicting internalizing problems, while no predictors were isolated for externalizing ones, and the group never indicate an effect on problems' rates.ConclusionsThe authors discuss the utility to maintain a research focus on attachment and alexithymia, also suggesting future directions of research. A need to determine potential distortions of results because of problems' informant and method of assessment is also highlighted.
“…However, results can be due to the small heterogeneous group, as some differences approached statistical significance, for example, LA adolescents showed higher attachment dismissal than COM peers with no difference with the residential care group in this type of insecurity. Therefore, researchers and professionals are invited to not stop to the absence of statistical difference with non‐adopted peers, maintaining clinical attention and long‐term attachment‐informed post‐adoptive monitoring in this group (Pace et al, 2018; Palacios et al, 2019; Santona et al, 2022, 2022), which may be still vulnerable as supposed not‐originally secure but developed‐secure in attachment after a positive adoption (Pace et al, 2019; Peñarrubia et al, 2022).…”
ObjectiveCompared to community adolescents (COM), adolescents placed in residential care (RC) or late adopted (LA) appear to show more emotional–behavioural problems. They also appear vulnerable in variables linked to emotional–behavioural problems, such as insecure–disorganized attachment and alexithymia. This study employs a mixed‐method multi‐informant approach to (1) compare adolescents placed in RC, LA and COM in emotional–behavioural problems, attachment and alexithymia and (2) investigate relationships and interplay of attachment and alexithymia concerning emotional–behavioural problems in these three groups.MethodParticipants were 174 adolescents (50 RC, 33 LA and 91 COM; Mage = 15, 53% boys and 47% girls). Adolescents' internalizing and externalizing problems were assessed through both caregiver‐reported and self‐reported questionnaires, while attachment and alexithymia were assessed with a mixed method, using interviews and self‐report questionnaires.ResultsThe results showed RC adolescents as more vulnerable in all variables, while LA and COM did not differ. Accounting for the group, attachment and alexithymia cumulatively predicted 25–43% of internalizing problems, and 19–43% of externalizing problems depending on the method of assessment or problems' informant (all p < 0.01). Alexithymia was both an independent predictor and interacted with preoccupied attachment in predicting internalizing problems, while no predictors were isolated for externalizing ones, and the group never indicate an effect on problems' rates.ConclusionsThe authors discuss the utility to maintain a research focus on attachment and alexithymia, also suggesting future directions of research. A need to determine potential distortions of results because of problems' informant and method of assessment is also highlighted.
“…Transracially adopted relatives are often aware of visible physical and racial differences between themselves and their adoptive family (Brodzinsky, 2011; Godon et al, 2014; Samuels, 2009). Transracially adopted relatives who encounter difficulty finding their birth family, may still be interested in connecting with their birthland and culture (Brocious, 2017; Santona et al, 2022). Reconnecting to birthplace and culture can play an important role in shaping the identity development of transracially adopted relatives (Santona et al, 2022) and can include the transracially adopted relative engaging in language learning, homeland/heritage tours, and interacting with their birth culture (Baden et al, 2012; Brocious, 2017).…”
ObjectiveThis study examined the underlying, unseen meanings accompanying the progressive verification of the reunification process experienced by American Indian fostered/adopted relatives who were separated from family of origin as children.BackgroundReunification is most often explored as an outcome (i.e., a result) and few studies examine the process of reunification (i.e., what happens or what facilitates it) or the underlying meaning of the reunification process for American Indian fostered/adopted relatives.MethodA secondary data analysis was conducted on survey data from the Experiences of Adopted and Fostered Individuals Project. The sample consisted of 70 American Indian relatives who were fostered/adopted as children and reunified as adults. Thematic analysis was conducted on open‐ended survey data.ResultsFour themes emanated from the data including: (1) searching, (2) facilitating, (3) calling home, and (4) repatriating. Participants searched for their families of origin using information and records (i.e., names of birth family, birth/adoption records). Reunification was facilitated by agencies, hired professionals, courts, and tribes. Relatives were called home by family, tribe, and ancestors. They repatriated through mail, phone, social media, and registries.ConclusionThis study contributed to the literature by using place identity theory to understand the progressive nature of the perceptions and comprehensions experienced by American Indian relatives during the reunification process. Place identity verification undergirds the process of reunification for American Indian fostered/adopted relatives including the underlying, unseen meanings that accompany the reunification process.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.