2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-02682-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological distress among university students: the role of mindfulness, decentering, reappraisal and emotion regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are supported by a recent study of university health science students in Tunisia (n = 366), with results showing a significant negative relationship between emotion regulation and distress (stress = β: −0.47, SE: 0.06, p < 0.05; anxiety = β: −0.30, SE: 0.07, p < 0.05; depression = β: −0.26, SE: 0.07, p < 0.05), further highlighting the potential protective role of emotion regulation for students' mental health during the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic [19]. In another recent study of 620 undergraduate students in Turkey, distress was significantly and positively associated with difficulties in emotion regulation [20]. All these results are in line with different pre-pandemic studies, which point to the negative correlation of ESR with anxiety, depression, and stress [15,62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data are supported by a recent study of university health science students in Tunisia (n = 366), with results showing a significant negative relationship between emotion regulation and distress (stress = β: −0.47, SE: 0.06, p < 0.05; anxiety = β: −0.30, SE: 0.07, p < 0.05; depression = β: −0.26, SE: 0.07, p < 0.05), further highlighting the potential protective role of emotion regulation for students' mental health during the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic [19]. In another recent study of 620 undergraduate students in Turkey, distress was significantly and positively associated with difficulties in emotion regulation [20]. All these results are in line with different pre-pandemic studies, which point to the negative correlation of ESR with anxiety, depression, and stress [15,62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Regarding the presence of emotional and mental health difficulties, different studies have shown a negative correlation of ESR with anxiety, depression, and stress [14,15]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, publications pointed to the same conclusion: that the use of different ESR strategies can reduce distress [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Much like understanding the pathology development in social anxiety vs. panic disorder vs. phobias, the understanding of how misophonia is developed and maintained is vital to proper treatment. For every single disorder, there are researchers who have created sub-CBT models of pathology development to predict treatment ( Kalanthroff and Wheaton, 2022 ; Ünlü Kaynakçı and Yerin, 2023 ; Riemann et al , 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering existing literature recommendations to embed skill building and safe relationships psychoeducation into CSE intervention design [2,45], the present study piloted an 'Emotion Regulation and Impulse Control' (ERIC) [46] and safe relationships (Your Relationships (YR) [47]) intervention program called 'ERIC + YR', for young women affected by CSE. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of ERIC + YR on the outcomes of emotion regulation, psychological wellbeing, and safe relationship knowledge and behaviours, in a randomized case series trial.…”
Section: The Current Study: Eric + Yr Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RCI method of analysis is designed to determine whether an individual's observed change was greater than the change that would be expected due to change and measurement error (i.e., reliability of the measure). Specifically, the RCI formula by Christensen and Menfoza [45] was used, which accounts for unreliability in both pre-and postscores (see Formula (2) from Hageman & Arrindell, 1992, [73] for further details). This formula is considered more conservative and methodologically sound than the original RCI formula [47].…”
Section: Clinical and Reliable Changementioning
confidence: 99%