2019
DOI: 10.1108/pr-07-2018-0237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological contract and attitudinal outcomes: multilevel mediation model

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the link between employer psychological contract (PC) fulfillment and employee attitudes (job satisfaction, organizational commitment and intention to leave the organization) by using employees’ perceptions of PC violation and organizational justice as serial mediators. Design/methodology/approach Data from 44 managers and 880 employees from 44 Spanish organizations were analyzed through multilevel structural equation modeling. Findings Results showed that em… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the contributions of this study, limitations must also be recognized. Firstly, in comparison to other studies using multilevel analysis ( Wilson et al, 2012 ; Beauchamp et al, 2014 ; Estreder et al, 2019 ), this study had participants distributed in few physical education groups, which may have had an impact on representativeness as well as on the power of the test and therefore on not detecting potentially significant relations. Secondly, this study measured whether the student perceived that their teacher provided corrective feedback, but not how often it was provided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the contributions of this study, limitations must also be recognized. Firstly, in comparison to other studies using multilevel analysis ( Wilson et al, 2012 ; Beauchamp et al, 2014 ; Estreder et al, 2019 ), this study had participants distributed in few physical education groups, which may have had an impact on representativeness as well as on the power of the test and therefore on not detecting potentially significant relations. Secondly, this study measured whether the student perceived that their teacher provided corrective feedback, but not how often it was provided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we noted in Section 1, the four resources we study represent a variety of contributions, along two dimensions. First, they capture relevant positive beliefs (informational justice and procedural justice; Colquitt, 2001) and positive emotions (job satisfaction and organizational commitment; Estreder et al, 2019) that pertain closely to employees' work functioning. Second, the two justice types inform employees' capability to leverage their exhibitionism in devoted peer-oriented helping behaviors, and job satisfaction and organizational commitment speak to the perceived attractiveness of leveraging the associated personal energy resources in this way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nor are fair procedures for making organizational decisions a guarantee that employees have access to all the information they need to ensure their professional well-being (Colquitt, 2001). The other two factors similarly might not align, in that job satisfaction captures employees' happiness with their daily work specifically, but their organizational commitment pertains to the loyalty they feel toward the organization as a whole (Estreder et al, 2019;Sim and Lee, 2018). Moreover, both informational justice and procedural justice capture cognitive beliefs about how the organization treats employees (Colquitt, 2001), whereas job satisfaction and organizational commitment speak to the positive emotions they experience in relation to their organizational membership (Estreder et al, 2019).…”
Section: Cor Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Guest (1998) ise, psikolojik sözleşmeyi etkileyen faktörleri; örgüt kültürü ve iklimi, insan kaynakları uygulamaları, deneyim, beklentiler ve diğer alternatifler olarak sınıflandırmıştır. Psikolojik sözleşme sonuçları bakımından çok sayıda bireysel ve örgütsel faktörle ilişkilendirilmiştir (Aselage ve Eisenberger, 2003;Coyle-Shapiro ve Kessler, 2003;Estreder, Tomás, Chambel, ve Ramos, 2019;Guest, 1998;Parzefall ve Hakanen, 2010;Soares ve Mosquera, 2019;Sturges, Conway, Guest, Liefooghe, 2005;Zhou, Plaisent, Zheng ve Bernard, 2014).…”
Section: Psikolojik Sözleşmeunclassified