2018
DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2018.1490556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological characteristics of potential SRI investors and its motivation in Japan: an experimental approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Riedl and Smeets (2017) find a positive correlation between risk tolerance and the amount invested in sustainable equity funds, but no significant impact on the probability to invest in a sustainable manner. Similarly, Nakai et al (2018) find no significant effects on the stated preferences for investments in socially responsible companies.…”
Section: Risk Preferences and Trustmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Riedl and Smeets (2017) find a positive correlation between risk tolerance and the amount invested in sustainable equity funds, but no significant impact on the probability to invest in a sustainable manner. Similarly, Nakai et al (2018) find no significant effects on the stated preferences for investments in socially responsible companies.…”
Section: Risk Preferences and Trustmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Secondly, we contribute to studies on the determinants of individual sustainable investments (e.g. Nilsson, 2008;Bauer and Smeets, 2015;Riedl and Smeets, 2017;Nakai et al, 2018;Brodback et al, 2019;Pedersen, 2016, 2019;Rossi et al, 2019). In particular, we thereby extend the set of potential determinants by implementing all dimensions of economic preferences according to Falk et al (2018) as well as personality traits measured by the Big Five according to Gosling et al (2003), consequently mitigating potential omitted variable bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a typical procedure in SC experiments or conjoint analyses (e.g. Bassen et al 2019;Hartzmark and Sussman 2019;Nakai et al 2018;Wilcox 2003), which often comprise hypothetical scenarios, alternatives, or attributes. However, we included some typical techniques in order to mitigate potential hypothetical bias, as described below.…”
Section: Data Experimental Design and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is consistent with the results of Bauer and Smeets (2015), who maintain that risk-tolerant clients allocate a smaller amount of their investments to socially responsible banks, and of Bassen et al (2019), who conclude that risk-tolerant people attach less importance to the climate performance of investment funds compared to their financial performance. However, it contradicts Riedl and Smeets (2017), who report a positive association between risk tolerance and the amount invested in socially responsible equity funds, and Nakai et al (2018), who do not find any significant effects on the declared preferences for investments in socially responsible companies. Delsen and Lehr (2019), on the other hand, find no evidence that appetite for risk has any influence on preference for sustainability.…”
Section: Values and Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 69%