2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological Capital in Food Safety Social Co-governance

Abstract: Social co-governance of food safety is an advocacy model to deal with current global food safety risks. Food safety co-governance involves the collaboration and partnership of government, industry, and society. The success of this collaboration is dependent on the construct of positive psychological capital. This paper discusses the concept of psychological capital and its four elements of self-efficacy, optimism, hope, and resiliency in line with co-governance in food safety. Accordingly, the paper proposes t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even to a larger context, psychological capital could influence marketing phenomena. For example, Chen and Wu (Chen and Wu, 2019) proposed that psychological capital is a foundation of food safety's social co-governance mechanisms, which incorporated and coordinate among multiple stakeholders in the society (e.g., government, business, consumers, third-parties, etc. It could also be reflected by studies that as the level of psychological capital varies across different countries and different types of employees, the level to which it is used for the establishment and functioning of different businesses also differs.…”
Section: Extension: From Sustainable Marketing To Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even to a larger context, psychological capital could influence marketing phenomena. For example, Chen and Wu (Chen and Wu, 2019) proposed that psychological capital is a foundation of food safety's social co-governance mechanisms, which incorporated and coordinate among multiple stakeholders in the society (e.g., government, business, consumers, third-parties, etc. It could also be reflected by studies that as the level of psychological capital varies across different countries and different types of employees, the level to which it is used for the establishment and functioning of different businesses also differs.…”
Section: Extension: From Sustainable Marketing To Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental cause of food safety problems lies in the information asymmetry between food manufacturers and consumers, which could lead to market failure ( Wu et al, 2018 ). If the government fails to address the market failure, it probably appears as a “double failure” of government public right and market private right in the process of food safety management ( Chen and Wu, 2019 ). Thus, it is critical for consumers to employ their unique advantages in food safety co-governance actively and effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, consumers are not only the most immediate beneficiaries of food safety but also the most direct sufferers of unsafe food. This means they have strong incentives to address food safety issues and protect their health ( Chen and Wu, 2019 ) and to contribute to the social co-governance of food safety ( Rouvière and Caswell, 2012 ). However, consumers have been criticized for lacking consciousness to voluntarily supervise food safety issues ( Mohd Nawi and Mohd Nasir, 2014 ; Ren et al, 2015 ) and lacking knowledge of the appropriate channels for making food safety complaints ( Cheng et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations