2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychologic distress and sleep quality among adults in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
48
1
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
48
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study finding was lower to a study conducted among adults in Turkey during the covid-19 pandemic that showed the prevalence of poor sleep quality was 55.1%. [17] This study finding was slightly higher compared with a cross-sectional study done in China among 56,679 general populations during covid-19 pandemic which revealed 29.2% insomnia. [15] Another cross-sectional study conducted among 1242 residents of Wuhan, China found 30% of the respondents had sleep disorder.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…This study finding was lower to a study conducted among adults in Turkey during the covid-19 pandemic that showed the prevalence of poor sleep quality was 55.1%. [17] This study finding was slightly higher compared with a cross-sectional study done in China among 56,679 general populations during covid-19 pandemic which revealed 29.2% insomnia. [15] Another cross-sectional study conducted among 1242 residents of Wuhan, China found 30% of the respondents had sleep disorder.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The prevalence of moderate/severe psychological distress (K6 scores: ≥5) in our study was high, similar to other countries that have been ravaged by the pandemic [ 11 , 17 , 20 , 57 ]. Differences in the prevalence in the different studies could be due to different measurements; for example, some used the K10 version of the scale [ 17 , 24 ], and some have either used the K6 as a continuous variable [ 48 ] or used the cut-off point of ≥13 to indicate serious mental illness [ 8 , 58 ]. At the K6 cut-off point of ≥13, the 5.4% prevalence is comparable to the 3.4–8% prevalence reported from studies conducted in the U.S. [ 38 , 39 , 40 ], including during the ongoing pandemic [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors known to be associated with increased psychological problems during the COVID-19 pandemic include higher perceived COVID-19 risk [ 14 ], being aged 30–59 years old, living with comorbidities [ 19 ], increased smoking, high levels of fear, change of employment status, and providing care to known or suspected COVID-19 cases [ 20 ]. Others include being aged 18–24 or 25–34 years old, being female, being a student, having physical symptoms and poor self-rated health status [ 21 ], living with young children, being employed before the pandemic [ 22 ], living in rural areas, having a lower socioeconomic status [ 23 ], and marital status [ 10 , 24 ]. On the contrary, having up-to-date and accurate health information and taking precautionary measures have been found to be protective against stress, anxiety, and depression [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a high prevalence of sleeping disorders was highlighted among physicians in Saudi Arabia [39]. However, previous studies conducted in other settings have stated a lower prevalence of sleep disorder or quality of sleep [25]. Studies examining the prevalence of sleep disorders during COVID-19, conducted in other settings, have reported lower prevalence than the present study, probably because those study examined only one aspect of sleep disorder, such as; Insomnia [40]- [42], hypersomnia [38], parasomnia [43], and sleep-disordered breathing with seven other indicators of sleep quality [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%