Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1985
DOI: 10.1097/00006842-198505000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychologic Differences Between High-, Normal-, and Low-Ren in Hypertensives

Abstract: Sixty-one male subjects with mild untreated essential hypertension were classified by renin-sodium profiling as high renin (HR--13 Subjects), normal renin (NR--33 Subjects), or low renin (LR--15 Subjects). The HR subjects reported significantly more symptoms of sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, paranoia, and psychotic thought than LR subjects on the Symptom Checklist (SCL-90). The NR subjects also reported more symptomatology than LR subjects. Similar differences between HR and LR subjects were foun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results may be due to conceptualizing hypertension as a homogeneous condition. According to Thailer et al (1985), essential hypertension may be a heterogeneous condition. Possible differences among the borderline hypertension group therefore may have been obscured by clustering all these men into a single group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results may be due to conceptualizing hypertension as a homogeneous condition. According to Thailer et al (1985), essential hypertension may be a heterogeneous condition. Possible differences among the borderline hypertension group therefore may have been obscured by clustering all these men into a single group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from the psychophysiological literature suggests another explanation. Essential hypertension may be a heterogeneous condition (Thailer, Friedman, Harshfield, & Pickering, 1985), and the inconsistencies in the selfdisclosure studies may be due to failure to differentiate among different types of hypertension.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be explained if FR subjects tended to have "inhibitory personalities," that is, if an attitude of cautious vigilance characterized their approach to interpersonal encounters (including, perhaps, basal BP assessment!). Symptoms of submissiveness, sensitivity, anxiety, and paranoia documented in hypertensive adults suggest that this is possible (37,38). Assessment of interpersonal behavior, personality and possibly dietary sodium sensitivity (39) might provide a model for the chronic persistence of inhibition-like effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppressed feelings, anger and hostility, 2-5 alexithymia, 6 anxiety, 4 -5,7-9 depression, 9 job strain, 10 stressful work conditions, 11 and psychosocial stress 12,13 are the most common factors associated with elevated blood pressure. Some studies on suppressed hostility 3,5 and increased anxiety 14 as possible psychosomatic mechanisms in hypertension suggest that they may have a role in the development of mild high-renin essential hypertension. Prospective studies support the view that suppressed feelings 2 and especially suppressed anger 5 are of importance in predicting blood pressure rise with age, whereas others do not find any association between anger behavior and change in blood pressure over time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%