1966
DOI: 10.1080/03637756609375483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychogrammatical factors in oral and written discourse by skilled communicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data concur with DeVito's conclusion that the speaker generalizes more than the writer. 40 Results from applying Rosenthal's empirical sentence test also confirm the assumption that high credibility sources construct more realistic or factual sentences than low credibility sources. Bryant and Wallace's prescription that factual statements "not only secure understanding for the listener, they secure respect for the speaker," has been empirically supported by these findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…These data concur with DeVito's conclusion that the speaker generalizes more than the writer. 40 Results from applying Rosenthal's empirical sentence test also confirm the assumption that high credibility sources construct more realistic or factual sentences than low credibility sources. Bryant and Wallace's prescription that factual statements "not only secure understanding for the listener, they secure respect for the speaker," has been empirically supported by these findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Writing down memories of a conversation or any stimuli might generate qualitative or quantitative outcomes that differ from those obtained when subjects recall orally. Research suggests that there are differences between the production of written and oral materials (DeVito, 1965(DeVito, , 1966(DeVito, , 1967Dillon, 1981;Hidi & Hildyard, forthcoming;Rubin. 1980;Stubbs, 1980;Schallert.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have maintained that written communication is typically less affective than oral communication (Chafe, 1982;Chafe and Danielewicz, 1987;DeVito, 1966DeVito, , 1967Redeker, 1984). These scholars maintain that, while the immediacy of an audience allows Speakers to invoke more personal elements in spoken discourse, writers can aflford to do so considerably less, because of the lack of a visible audience.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%