2002
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.72.2.162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychoanatomical substrates of Balint's syndrome

Abstract: Objectives: From a series of glimpses, we perceive a seamless and richly detailed visual world. Cerebral damage, however, can destroy this illusion. In the case of Bálint's syndrome, the visual world is perceived erratically, as a series of single objects. The goal of this review is to explore a range of psychological and anatomical explanations for this striking visual disorder and to propose new directions for interpreting the findings in Bálint's syndrome and related cerebral disorders of visual processing.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
124
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
(155 reference statements)
4
124
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…If the priority map is crucial for the selection of sensory contents by attention, damage to this representation, in particular if it is bilateral, should have devastating consequences on spatial attention. this is indeed what happens in patients with Bálint syndrome, who in severe cases are described as virtually blind due to their failure to select stimuli for conscious processing (Rizzo and Vecera 2002;holmes and horrax 1919;Kim and Robertson 2001). however, it is unclear why bilateral damage to the parietal priority map should result in a strong ocular bias towards central regions (or 'sticky' fixation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If the priority map is crucial for the selection of sensory contents by attention, damage to this representation, in particular if it is bilateral, should have devastating consequences on spatial attention. this is indeed what happens in patients with Bálint syndrome, who in severe cases are described as virtually blind due to their failure to select stimuli for conscious processing (Rizzo and Vecera 2002;holmes and horrax 1919;Kim and Robertson 2001). however, it is unclear why bilateral damage to the parietal priority map should result in a strong ocular bias towards central regions (or 'sticky' fixation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…how can 'sticky' fixation during ocular exploration be explained? some authors (Rafal 1997;Rizzo and Vecera 2002) proposed that oculomotor apraxia is due to a pathological constriction of visual attention to a single object. according to this hypothesis, patients make erratic eye movements because of a reduced 'spatial window' of attention (Dalrymple et al 2013a) and consequently the failure to disengage attention from a fixated object.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Balint's syndrome has been most often associated with occipital-parietal damage and centred in the angular gyrus 82 , but neglect has been more often associated with temporal-parietal damage and centred in the supramarginal gyrus 83 . It therefore seems plausible that unilateral neglect and Balint's syndrome reflect different underlying deficits.…”
Section: Balint's Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çünkü sendromun semptomlarında bireysel farklılıklar görülmüştür. Sendromun bireysel semptomlarını sadece ayırmak değil, ayrıca oldukça geniş kategoride sunulan defisitleri standart nöropsikolojik testlerle değerlendirmek sıklıkla zordur ve bireysel vakalar arasında önemli çeşitlilik vardır [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified