Psychoanalysis and art: Dialogues in the creative process

Papiasvili, Eva D.; Mayers, Linda A.

doi:10.1080/0803706x.2011.598185

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The researches of Papiasvili and Mayers (2011) present the relationships of Psychoanalysis with Art. Their article pointed out that after the centenary of publication of Freud (1991) the Psychoanalysis had focused on Art Theory, ignoring the artist's motivational conflict.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dialogue in In-Depth Cognition of the Subject’s Psyche: Functioning of Pragmatic Referent Statements

Yatsenko

Ivashkevych

Halushko³

et al. 2022

Psycholing.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of our research was also to analyze the dialogue in in-depth cognition of the subject’s psyche in the psycholinguistic paradigm. The latter allows us to distinguish pragmatic-explicit and pragmatic-implicit reference statements in psychoanalytic dialogues, to classify such statements, to give their characteristics, which will further help psychoanalysts to build dialogues with patients in psychotherapeutic practice. Methods. In our research we’ve used author’s Psychodynamic Methodology of organizing of psychotherapeutic process, which contributes to the problem of understanding the essence of the patient’s psyche. The improvement of diagnostic tools stipulated the clarification of the focus of the process of active socio-psychological cognition on optimizing the psyche of the patient in the psychotherapeutic process. Also we proposed group method of active socio-psychological cognition (hereinafter referred to as the ASPC) which emphasized on a law of positive disintegration of the psyche of the person and its secondary integration at a higher level of mental development of a man (Yatsenko, 2020). Results. The nature of emphasized by us pragmatic-implicit reference statements, the peculiarities of their functioning in the whole text fragment will resemble semantic performatives. In the paradigm of pragmatic statements, we will accept them as pragmatic statements. Although both pragmatic-implicit and pragmatic-explicit reference statements are very important for psychoanalytic dialogues. Pragmatic-explicit reference statements have all the features of performatives and can be fully characterized as pragmatic performatives. Conclusions. It was proved that positive pragmatic-explicit and pragmatic-implicit reference statements in psychoanalytic dialogue allowed us to identify the links between superficial and hidden semantic parameters of the patient’s psyche, which under the conditions of comprehension of his/her consciousness can open up prospects for their individual reconstruction by the subject, without the psychoanalyst’s help. This process facilitates the harmonization and functional optimization of the psyche of the person in in-depth correctional process. This way of solving a problem by a person sets the awakening of adequate capabilities of the subject, making by the patients’ some adjustments to their own behavior by expanding and deepening the boundaries of self-awareness in the process of active socio-psychological cognition.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dialogue in In-Depth Cognition of the Subject’s Psyche: Functioning of Pragmatic Referent Statements

Yatsenko

Ivashkevych

Halushko³

et al. 2022

Psycholing.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Umetnici, prema psihoanalitičarima, svojim delima imaju nešto itekako značajno i važno da kažu o psihičkom svetu pojedinca. Frojd se divio piscima i njihovoj sposobnosti da dopru do dubokih istina kroz sopstvene emocije, smatrao je umetnike glasom nesvesnog: "Umetniku je data mogućnost da, u delu koje stvara, izrazi svoje najtajnije mentalne impulse, koji su skriveni čak i od njega samoga" [1]. On ne samo da je primetio vezu između kreativnog umetničkog dela i psihoanalize, već ih je smatrao i komplementarnim.…”

unclassified

A work of art: Expression of disease symptoms

Đaković-Švajcer¹

2015

Tim Med Glas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Semantic and Pragmatic Meaning of Discursive Units in the Process of Communication of a Psychotherapist with a Client

Maksymenko,

Ivashkevych,

Kharchenko

et al. 2023

Psycholing.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of our research is to study semantic and pragmatic meaning of discursive units in the process of communication of a psychotherapist with teenagers with autonomic dysfunctions, using the methods of Positive Psychotherapy. Methods. The main method which has been used in our article was the method of providing psychological help to teenagers with autonomic dysfunction with a help of a five-step model of Positive Psychotherapy (Peseschkian, 2000). To analyze the empirical results of the study the psychodiagnostic technique “Balance Model of Mental Energy Distribution” was used (Peseschkian, 2000). We also used the author’s 24-scale bipolar version of the semantic differential for understanding the semantic and pragmatic meaning of discursive units in the process of communication of a psychotherapist with a client. Results. In our research we determined the semantic and pragmatic meanings of discursive words, such as: (1) actualization of the previous context; (2) anthropocentricity of the statement; (3) synonymy of the context given by discursive words; (4) antonymy of the context given by discursive words; (5) hyponymic context given by discursive words; (6) amplification of the previous context; (7) amplification of conclusions using updated key statements; (8) expectedness/unexpectedness of the addresser’s statement. Conclusions. The specificity of paradigmatic connections of discursive words (first of all, synonymous, antonymic, hyponymic, anthropocentric, actualized, amplified, expected or unexpected) is determined by their contextual dependence. We call such semantic and pragmatic communicative meanings, which differentiate discursive words in the paradigm of communicative situations in the process of communication between a psychotherapist and a client, intentional scripts. They are distinguished by variable lexical and functional possibilities, depending on the context of the utterance, as well as different variations of lexical and semantic, pragmatic and functional constructions.

show abstract

Psychoanalysis and art: Dialogues in the creative process

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

Dialogue in In-Depth Cognition of the Subject’s Psyche: Functioning of Pragmatic Referent Statements

Dialogue in In-Depth Cognition of the Subject’s Psyche: Functioning of Pragmatic Referent Statements

A work of art: Expression of disease symptoms

Semantic and Pragmatic Meaning of Discursive Units in the Process of Communication of a Psychotherapist with a Client

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About