2017
DOI: 10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0024.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psycho-Ecological Systems Model: A Systems Approach to Planning and Gauging the Community Impact of Community-Engaged Scholarship

Abstract: This article presents the Psycho-Ecological Systems Model (PESM) -an integrative conceptual model rooted in General Systems Theory (GST (Bronfenbrenner, 1979), the biopsychosocial model (Kiesler, 2000), and the principle of reciprocal determinism (Bandura, 1978) (and sustainable) transdisciplinary (and multilevel) projects; (c) . In the third section, we discuss implications of PESM for community-based research. A greater emphasis on the development of integrative conceptual frameworks may increase the lik… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building on Bronfenbrenner's model, Reeb et al (2017) proposed the psycho-ecological systems model (PESM) that highlights individual vulnerabilities and resilience factors. Vulnerabilities are internal risk factors such as low self-esteem, maladaptive behavior, mental illness, and risky behavior.…”
Section: Psycho-ecological Systems Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Building on Bronfenbrenner's model, Reeb et al (2017) proposed the psycho-ecological systems model (PESM) that highlights individual vulnerabilities and resilience factors. Vulnerabilities are internal risk factors such as low self-esteem, maladaptive behavior, mental illness, and risky behavior.…”
Section: Psycho-ecological Systems Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PESM model suggests that the development of CBIs should begin by identifying individual resilience and vulnerability factors. Reeb et al (2017)…”
Section: Psycho-ecological Systems Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals exist within an immediate environment that is shaped by their actions and that in turn shapes both who they are and their patterns of behaviors. Consistent with this conception, we included Bandura’s (1978) concept of triadic reciprocal causation in our model (see also Reeb et al, 2017). Triadic reciprocal causation recognizes the interactions between (1) the person’s biological processes, psychological constructs, and physical features; (2) behaviors displayed by the person (represented by Bs near the center of Figure 1); and (3) the environment that shapes and is shaped by the person and his or her behaviors.…”
Section: Comprehensive Theoretical Models Of Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the use of “situational leadership” as a model, we can shift the perspective from mentorship as performance to mentorship as a dynamic interaction with ongoing learning for both the mentor and mentee. 32 For the mentor–mentee relationship, we borrow from the Psycho-Ecological Systems Model 33 which primarily integrates Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Model. 34 In contrast to both the Psycho-Ecological Systems Model and the Ecological Systems Model, at the center of our conceptual framework is the interaction and relationship between the mentor and the mentee.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework For Mentoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 The mesosystem is in effect a “system of the microsystems.” In our model, we posit this to be the interactions that the mentor and mentee have with their surroundings, family, different social agencies, etc. 33 The exosystem reflects the institutional factors that include the current structures, available institutional resources, organizational ethos, and policy and partnership cultures. It is important to consider these both from the mentor’s and the mentee’s institutional perspective, as the social interactions (microsystems) that they have within the institution would influence the mentorship interactions.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework For Mentoringmentioning
confidence: 99%