R ecent events underscore the morbidity and mortality resulting from structural racism. As cultural specialists, we believe that clinical benefits will accrue from better integrating cultural and societal-structural approaches in psychiatric assessment, care planning, and case management. For example, consider the evaluation of a 35-year-old Latinx immigrant woman with major depression. It helps to know both how culture shapes her treatment expectations and that her symptoms started after new immigration policies made it harder to petition her children.The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) chapter on cultural formulation explains "culture" as generationally transmitted systems of knowledge, concepts, and rules, which change over time. It refers to language, religion, rituals, family structure, morals, and legal systems. Exposure to multiple cultures typically shapes personal identities and helps make sense of experience. The Outline for Cultural Formulation (OCF) first appeared in DSM-IV as a framework for cultural assessment (Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, 2002). Its four domains encompass a) cultural identity; b) cultural explanations of illness; c) cultural interpretation of psychosocial stressors, supports, and levels of functioning; and d) cultural elements of the patient-clinician relationship. A fifth domain summarizes information from the other four about diagnosis and treatment. A Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) was developed and evaluated in an international field trial, and included in DSM-5 to facilitate use of the OCF and enhance cultural competence in psychiatric practice and training (Corral et al., 2017;Lewis-Fernández et al., 2016).Another approach to clinical assessment, termed "structural competency," was suggested in 2014 to prioritize the role of societal structures creating and sustaining health inequalities (Metzl and Roberts, 2014). These structures refer to health systems and services, employment and educational opportunities, food security, community infrastructure, housing, criminal justice, and access to legal protections. Among social determinants of health, structural factors produce racial and ethnic disparities, and they limit access to health care and social services. They also influence the experience and outcomes of mental illness and health care practices, possibly including coercion and criminalization. Acknowledging structural factors in case formulation enables clinicians to consider clinically relevant social constraints beyond individual vulnerabilities (Holmes et al., 2020). Clinical training programs in structural competency identify constraints, provide assistance to manage health and social systems, and may include advocacy for systemic change (Hansen and Metzl, 2019).These two approaches to case formulation are currently framed as distinctive in both theory and practice: cultural psychiatry rooted in medical anthropology and structural competency rooted in social medicine. Structural competency was initially just...