1994
DOI: 10.1002/gps.930090402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychiatric services for elderly people: Evaluating system performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limits the control that program staff have over the interventions and the measurement of their outcomes. While the program's impact in improving overall care practices within a community and in changing the care system as a whole may be the key indicators of program success, evaluation of these diffuse and rather nebulous impacts is an even more difficult task 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limits the control that program staff have over the interventions and the measurement of their outcomes. While the program's impact in improving overall care practices within a community and in changing the care system as a whole may be the key indicators of program success, evaluation of these diffuse and rather nebulous impacts is an even more difficult task 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are well covered elsewhere, either at the general level of exposition and principle (Drummond et al, 1987). or in their application to mental health care and treatment (Knapp, 1995), or introduced and illustrated in relation to services for elderly people with psychiatric problems (Keen, 1993;Harrison and Sheldon, 1994;Knapp et al, 1995). Gray and Fenn (1993) offer the most recent UK burden-of-illness evaluation in the area of old age psychiatry.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these influences on outcome are endogenous to the care process, and thus within the control (immediately or in the longer term) of managers, psychiatrists, social workers or family carers. Other influences are exogenous: it is the latter group which tend to be overlooked in Donabedian's (1 980) framework (and see Harrison and Sheldon, 1994), but which can have marked, perhaps decisive, influences on outcomes and costs.…”
Section: Economic Evaluations: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%