2007
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.58.4.509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychiatric Disorders Among Adults Seeking Emergency Disaster Assistance After a Wildland-Urban Interface Fire

Abstract: Individuals seeking immediate emergency assistance related to the wildland-urban interface fire were at elevated risk of psychopathology in the weeks after the fire. A short, easily administered, two-item screener, composed of items assessing fire exposure severity, appears to hold promise for aiding early identification of persons at risk of postfire psychopathology. These findings may also have implications for other mass disasters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 10 deemed to have higher risk of bias, 4 did not adequately adjust for important covariates (Azevedo et al 2011; Cooper et al 1994; Prass et al 2012; Resnick et al 2015), 2 were likely underpowered due to small sample size (Cooper et al 1994; Vedal and Dutton 2006), 3 used retrospective self-report for exposure assessment with high potential for bias (Ho et al 2014; McDermott et al 2005; Marshall et al 2007), and the exposure assessment in 2 other studies was not clearly related to smoke from wildfires (Analitis et al 2012, Caamano-Isorna et al 2011). The remaining 43 studies deemed to have low to moderate risk of bias are discussed below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 10 deemed to have higher risk of bias, 4 did not adequately adjust for important covariates (Azevedo et al 2011; Cooper et al 1994; Prass et al 2012; Resnick et al 2015), 2 were likely underpowered due to small sample size (Cooper et al 1994; Vedal and Dutton 2006), 3 used retrospective self-report for exposure assessment with high potential for bias (Ho et al 2014; McDermott et al 2005; Marshall et al 2007), and the exposure assessment in 2 other studies was not clearly related to smoke from wildfires (Analitis et al 2012, Caamano-Isorna et al 2011). The remaining 43 studies deemed to have low to moderate risk of bias are discussed below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How should subjective experience be weighed against objective degrees of exposure? On the one hand, a recent study of victims of bushfires in California suggested using a simple screen with items of objective severity of fire exposure (Marshall, Schell, Elliott, Rayburn, & Jaycox, 2007). On the other hand, subjective measures of distress or perceived threat to life have often been better predictors of PTSD symptoms among different survivor groups than have objective measures of danger (Ehlers, Mayou, & Bryant, 1998;McNally, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, disaster survivors who have experienced bereavement have been found to be at greater risk for postdisaster distress (e.g., Gibb, 1989), which might be due to decreased perceptions of support. Disaster survivors who have experienced greater property damage have also been shown to be at greater risk for postdisaster distress (e.g., Marshall, Schell, Elliot, Rayburn, & Jaycox, 2007). Again, this could be in part due to declines in social support, as attending to property damage and insurance claims could interfere with support processes.…”
Section: Predictors Of Social Support Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%