1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1980.tb07688.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychiatric case identification in general practice: Self‐rating versus interview

Abstract: Sixty‐four general practice patients diagnosed by a general practitioner as psychiatrically disturbed and 42 patients judged by the general practitioner as psychologically healthy, were interviewed by psychiatrists by means of the “Schedule for a Standardized Assessment of Depressive Disorders” (SADD) developed by WHO. A subsample of 77 patients also filled out the “General Health Questionnaire” (GHQ) by Goldberg. A relatively high agreement between the “General Health Questionnaire” and the psychiatrist's jud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In its complete form, in the shortened 30-item and 12-item versions (Goldberg, 1978) or in the scaled 28-item derived from factor analysis (Goldberg and Hillier, 1979), it was translated into many different languages, eg Italian (Fontanesi et al, 1985), Spanish (Lobo et al, 1986) and French (Bolognini et al, 1989;Pariente and Guelfi, 1990). These versions were internationally validated and used throughout the general population (eg Tarnopolovsky et al, 1979;Benjamin et al, 1982;Banks, 1983;Chan and Chan, 1983;Bolognini et al, 1989), in general practice (Marks et al, 1979;Katschnig et al, 1980;Cleary et al, 1982;Hobbs et al, 1983 andSkuse and Williams, 1984;Bellantuono et al, 1987;Goldberg and Bridges, 1987) or more specialized cases, such as in neurology (Rabins and Brooks, 1981;Bridges and Goldberg, 1986) or cardiology (Vazquez-Barquero et al, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its complete form, in the shortened 30-item and 12-item versions (Goldberg, 1978) or in the scaled 28-item derived from factor analysis (Goldberg and Hillier, 1979), it was translated into many different languages, eg Italian (Fontanesi et al, 1985), Spanish (Lobo et al, 1986) and French (Bolognini et al, 1989;Pariente and Guelfi, 1990). These versions were internationally validated and used throughout the general population (eg Tarnopolovsky et al, 1979;Benjamin et al, 1982;Banks, 1983;Chan and Chan, 1983;Bolognini et al, 1989), in general practice (Marks et al, 1979;Katschnig et al, 1980;Cleary et al, 1982;Hobbs et al, 1983 andSkuse and Williams, 1984;Bellantuono et al, 1987;Goldberg and Bridges, 1987) or more specialized cases, such as in neurology (Rabins and Brooks, 1981;Bridges and Goldberg, 1986) or cardiology (Vazquez-Barquero et al, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agreement between general practitioners and psychiatrists on the identification of psychiatric cases was of the same order as in a comparable study conducted some years ago in Vienna (Katschnig et al 1980), as well as in a recently completed field survey in three communities of Upper Bavaria (Dilling et al 1984). The specificity of the general practitioners' case-finding -i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As we used the Lickert-scaled version (0, 1, 2, 3), the scoring range is from 0 to 90. The 30-item GHQ was translated into German and validated in a primary health care sample against standardized psychiatric interviews by Katschnig, Berner, Haushofer, Barfuss and Seelig (1980), and was used in a variety of studies (for example, Pakesch, Katschnig, Dittrich, Loimer, Rasinger and Tutsch, 1993).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%