2019
DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz258.676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PSV-38 Fatty acids profile of subcutaneous fat deposition in Nellore bulls classified by feed efficiency

Abstract: Microbial population and ruminal fermentation patterns differ according residual feed intake (RFI) classes, with possible alterations in biohydrogenation and consequently in fatty acids (FA) profile of subcutaneous fat deposition. This study aimed to evaluate FA profile of subcutaneous fat deposition in Nellore bulls classified by RFI. Data from four different trials, totaling 106 Nellore bulls (475.5 ± 77 kg of slaughter BW and 623 ± 97 d of age at slaughter), previously classified by RFI as positive (PRFI) o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table S5 , the results were comparable with that shown in Table 3 , where variation between H- and L-RFI was only observed for KC animals. The effect of RFI on subcutaneous adipose tissue FAs was also reported for Nellore bulls, that the subcutaneous adipose tissue of H-RFI bulls contained higher cis vaccenic FA and lower oleic FA compared to that in L-RFI bulls 49 . Such opposing results may be due to the unique genetics of each cattle breed, as the markers for RFI were known to be breed-specific (Higgins et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…As shown in Table S5 , the results were comparable with that shown in Table 3 , where variation between H- and L-RFI was only observed for KC animals. The effect of RFI on subcutaneous adipose tissue FAs was also reported for Nellore bulls, that the subcutaneous adipose tissue of H-RFI bulls contained higher cis vaccenic FA and lower oleic FA compared to that in L-RFI bulls 49 . Such opposing results may be due to the unique genetics of each cattle breed, as the markers for RFI were known to be breed-specific (Higgins et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%