2011 International Conference on Energy, Automation and Signal 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iceas.2011.6147126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PSO based location and parameter setting of advance SVC controller with comparison to GA in mitigating small signal oscillations

Abstract: This paper aims to select the optimal location and setting parameters of Static VAR Compensator (SVC) controller using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) to mitigate small signal oscillations in a multimachine power system. Though Power System Stabilizers (PSSs) are prime choice in this issue, its performance gets affected by changes in network configurations, load variations etc. Hence installation of FACTS device, SVC has been suggested here in order to achieve appreciable damping o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, static objectives such as minimising over-power flows and voltage deviations, maximising voltage stability margin, available transfer capacity, total transfer capacity are intended. However, dynamic objectives such as maximising small-signal stability and large-signal stability have been considered in a few cases ( [64,69,79,[83][84][85]). Furthermore, FACTS devices' cost, generation cost and power losses are some other objectives that have been considered in literature.…”
Section: Discussion From Viewpoint Of Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In most cases, static objectives such as minimising over-power flows and voltage deviations, maximising voltage stability margin, available transfer capacity, total transfer capacity are intended. However, dynamic objectives such as maximising small-signal stability and large-signal stability have been considered in a few cases ( [64,69,79,[83][84][85]). Furthermore, FACTS devices' cost, generation cost and power losses are some other objectives that have been considered in literature.…”
Section: Discussion From Viewpoint Of Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the problem has also been solved by simulated annealing and PSO's outperformance over SA has been concluded. In [69], optimal controller parameters and location of SVC are determined by PSO in order to maximise damping ratio. There are three tuning parameters of the SVC controller; the controller gain, lead time constant, lag time constant.…”
Section: Application Of Pso In Facts Allocation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in [26]- [30] a comparison between these and other methods is done. The fact that there is not a dominant technique makes heuristic and meta-heuristics methods unreliable.…”
Section: Facts Location and Optimization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) has some attractive characteristics compared to GA and other similar evolutionary techniques [15]. In [8] the optimal tuning and placement of PSS using Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm is proposed, where two eigenvalue based objective functions to enhance the damping of electromechanical modes are considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%