2010
DOI: 10.3354/meps08571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PSII photoinhibition and photorepair in Symbiodinium (Pyrrhophyta) differs between thermally tolerant and sensitive phylotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
107
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
107
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain how elevated temperatures affect the photochemical pathway: excessive photon absorption by light harvesting antennae damages the PSII reaction center, particularly the D1 protein [17][18][19]; elevated temperatures may limit photosynthesis by destabilizing the thylakoid membranes [7]; the activity of Rubisco may be a primary site of damage by elevated temperature [20], though a recent study suggests that inhibition of the Calvin-Benson cycle alone does not induce coral bleaching [21]; damaged PSII reaction centers may be replaced by re-synthesized D1 protein, but this mechanism is inhibited when temperature is elevated [10]; elevated temperatures may also suppress the synthesis of light harvesting antennae protein at the translational step, thereby promoting losses of major light harvesting proteins [9]. Several of these postulates have been supported by recent studies indicating that the thermal stress susceptibility of Symbiodinium is determined by the repair capacity of the photosynthetic mechanism [10,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain how elevated temperatures affect the photochemical pathway: excessive photon absorption by light harvesting antennae damages the PSII reaction center, particularly the D1 protein [17][18][19]; elevated temperatures may limit photosynthesis by destabilizing the thylakoid membranes [7]; the activity of Rubisco may be a primary site of damage by elevated temperature [20], though a recent study suggests that inhibition of the Calvin-Benson cycle alone does not induce coral bleaching [21]; damaged PSII reaction centers may be replaced by re-synthesized D1 protein, but this mechanism is inhibited when temperature is elevated [10]; elevated temperatures may also suppress the synthesis of light harvesting antennae protein at the translational step, thereby promoting losses of major light harvesting proteins [9]. Several of these postulates have been supported by recent studies indicating that the thermal stress susceptibility of Symbiodinium is determined by the repair capacity of the photosynthetic mechanism [10,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Phylotype selection-We focused on four phylotypes of Symbiodinium that have previously been characterized for their photobiological Hennige et al 2009) and stress tolerance Suggett et al 2008;Ragni et al 2010) characteristics: three phylotypes from clade A (A1, A13, and A2) and one phylotype from clade B (B1). These phylotypes have previously been isolated from reef-building corals, as well as other host types, including jellyfish, soft corals, bivalves, gorgonian sea fans, and sea anemones (Freudenthal 1962;LaJeunesse 2001;Rogers and Davis 2006;Santos and LaJeunesse 2009), and identified in hospite across a range of geographic locations-including the Caribbean; western, eastern, and central Pacific; and the Red sea-apart from phylotype A13 (formally designated as A1.1 in Robison and Warner [2006] and LaJeunesse [2001], but now reclassified as A13 in LaJeunesse et al 2009) which, to date, has only been isolated in the Caribbean (LaJeunesse 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Symbiodinium genus is taxonomically diverse, with hundreds of phylotypes, or ''species,'' thought to exist across the world's oceans (Coffroth and Santos 2005). These phylotypes of Symbiodinium are able to occupy different environmental niches, most likely as a result of their substantial phylotypespecific range of physiological responses to environmental change (Hennige et al 2009) and stress Suggett et al 2008;Ragni et al 2010), as well as the generalist vs. specialist modes of specificity with their cnidarian hosts (Finney et al 2010;LaJeunesse et al 2010). Symbiodinium is, thus, an important model organism to examine genotypic-specific responses to environmental change; however, their potential sensitivity to OA is currently unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changing r i changes the maximal amount of C, N, and chlorophyll that one cell could contain. Secondly, the repair rate coefficients a Photosystem repair is a vital process in the protection against bleaching, and it has been speculated that variations in the ability of different coral species to photo-repair underlies the difference in bleaching susceptibility (Takahashi et al 2004Ragni et al 2010). In vitro bleaching 'sensitive' Symbiodinium have been shown to have a reduced photo-repair rate in comparison to 'tolerant' clades of Symbiodinium Ragni et al 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the repair rate coefficients a Photosystem repair is a vital process in the protection against bleaching, and it has been speculated that variations in the ability of different coral species to photo-repair underlies the difference in bleaching susceptibility (Takahashi et al 2004Ragni et al 2010). In vitro bleaching 'sensitive' Symbiodinium have been shown to have a reduced photo-repair rate in comparison to 'tolerant' clades of Symbiodinium Ragni et al 2010). Although in situ measurements of photo-repair are still sparse, it has been shown that the Symbiodinium associated with the bleaching-tolerant Porites astreoides had a higher repair rate than Symbiodinium associated with the bleaching-sensitive Monstastraea faveolata (Hennige et al 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%