2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudomonas putida infection in rainbow trout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
64
4
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
64
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in the Table (1) showed that, all Pseudomonas and Aeromonas species are characterized by Gram-negative motile rods with cytochrome oxidase and those findings agree with Altinok et al (2006); El-Barbary (2010a,b); Nathan et al (2011) whose reported that Pseudomonas species are Gram negative, oxidase positive, rod shaped bacteria that exist in the environment. P. fluorescens showed variation in some phenotypic tests such as gelatin hydrolysis where it has ability to hydrolyze gelatin in contrast to P. putida (Krieg and Holt, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results in the Table (1) showed that, all Pseudomonas and Aeromonas species are characterized by Gram-negative motile rods with cytochrome oxidase and those findings agree with Altinok et al (2006); El-Barbary (2010a,b); Nathan et al (2011) whose reported that Pseudomonas species are Gram negative, oxidase positive, rod shaped bacteria that exist in the environment. P. fluorescens showed variation in some phenotypic tests such as gelatin hydrolysis where it has ability to hydrolyze gelatin in contrast to P. putida (Krieg and Holt, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Some of these results of antibiogram sensitivity are in agreement with those of Eissa et al (2010) who reported that P. anguilliseptica, P. putida and P. aureginosa revealed that almost all of them were sensitive to Gentamicin, Erythromycin Novobiocin and Sulfa-trimethoprime. Also, Altinok et al (2006) reported that P. putida has intrinsically high resistance to Chloramphenicol, Ampicillin, Erythromycin, Tetracycline, Rifampicin, Naladixic acid and Streptomycin. In another study, Darak and Barde (2015) reported that P. fluorescens was very sensitive to Kanamycin, Nalidixic acid, Gentamicin, Neomycin and less sensitive to Amikacin and Tetracycline, and Chlorophenicol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher efficiency that was achieved by the addition of nutrients into seawater was partially due to the gradually increasing population of P. putida SP1 in the environment. As several isolates of P. putida were recently reported to be of pathogenic significance (Bouallèguea et al 2004;Altinok et al 2006), we estimated the pathogenicity of P. putida SP1 to secure its use for bioremediation. The LD 50 of P. putida SP1 to two kinds of important marine fish was 1,000-fold higher than the LD 50 of P. fluorescens TSS (10 6.1 ) ), demonstrating that P. putida SP1 was drastically attenuated in its overall bacterial virulence and potentially was a bacterial strain with low pathogenicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some species of Pseudomonad particularly P. aeruginosa are opportunistic pathogens that can cause serious and life-threatening infections in immunocompromised and cystic fibrosis patients [2,3]. In aquaculture, P. aeruginosa and P. fluorescens especially are the most frequently isolated opportunistic pathogenic species [4,5] although other species may also be serious opportunistic pathogens, including P. anguilliseptica in eels, Anguilla japonica [6] P. chlororaphis in amago trout, Oncorhynchus rhodurus [7], P. plecoglossicida in ayu, P. altivelis [8] and more recently P. putida in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%