2019
DOI: 10.3390/v11121089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA5oct Jumbo Phage Impacts Planktonic and Biofilm Population and Reduces Its Host Virulence

Abstract: The emergence of phage-resistant mutants is a key aspect of lytic phages-bacteria interaction and the main driver for the co-evolution between both organisms. Here, we analyze the impact of PA5oct jumbo phage treatment on planktonic/cell line associated and sessile P. aeruginosa population. Besides its broad-spectrum activity and efficient bacteria reduction in both airway surface liquid (ASL) model, and biofilm matrix degradation, PA5oct appears to persist in most of phage-resistant clones. Indeed, a high per… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the relationship between LPS and virulence has previously been reported, such as the role of the membrane protein WbpM [24]. Hence, the link between losing a putative phage receptor, especially sugar moieties, and fitness and virulence of the pathogenic bacteria can further be highlighted, as has been described for multiple other pathosystems [25][26][27][28]. As such, one can postulate that bacteria that are resistant to these phages due to aberration in LPS pose lesser threats to their host plants.…”
Section: Elucidation Of the Differences In Bacterial Receptors For Phmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, the relationship between LPS and virulence has previously been reported, such as the role of the membrane protein WbpM [24]. Hence, the link between losing a putative phage receptor, especially sugar moieties, and fitness and virulence of the pathogenic bacteria can further be highlighted, as has been described for multiple other pathosystems [25][26][27][28]. As such, one can postulate that bacteria that are resistant to these phages due to aberration in LPS pose lesser threats to their host plants.…”
Section: Elucidation Of the Differences In Bacterial Receptors For Phmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We note that the function ρ(t) is increasing over time. Due to Eq (11), the parameter κ is a function decreasing over time and the parameter D M increases over time in Stage 2. The interpretation of the process is that at Stage 1 there is a sub-inhibitory concentration of the antibiotic near the bacteria located in the biofilm plums.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high insensitivity of biofilm to antibiotics forces the search for alternative treatment solutions. Bacteriophages turn out to be a convenient weapon against both planktonic and sessile forms of bacteria [3,6,7]. To evaluate the complex and sublime interactions of antibacterials and biofilm cells it was necessary to develop various measurement techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also an interesting method for biofilm measurement based on interferometry spectroscopy allowing us to determine the changes in the diffusion rate through the biofilm matrix [3,7,16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%