2006
DOI: 10.2138/am.2006.1885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudojohannite from Jachymov, Musonoi, and La Creusaz: A new member of the zippeite-group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Originally it was reported to be triclinic, Cu 5 (UO 2 ) 6 (SO 4 ) 3 (OH) 16 (H 2 O) 14 , with a = 13.754(2), b = 9.866(1), c = 8.595(2) Å, α = 103.84(2)°, β = 90.12(2)°, γ = 106.75(2)°, and V = 1081.3(4) Å 3 . Brugger et al (2006) concluded that pseudojohannite is a member of the zippeite group, based on the characteristic U:S ratio 2:1 (Burns 2005; Krivovichev and Plášil 2013), and they revised chemical formula of pseudojohannite accordingly to Cu 6.5 [(UO 2 ) 4 O 4 (SO 4 ) 2 ] 2 (OH) 5 (H 2 O) 25 . The final conclusion that pseudojohannite is a member of the zippeite-group of minerals was documented by the full crystal structure solution presented by Plášil et al (2012) on the material from Widowmaker mine, White Canyon, Utah, USA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally it was reported to be triclinic, Cu 5 (UO 2 ) 6 (SO 4 ) 3 (OH) 16 (H 2 O) 14 , with a = 13.754(2), b = 9.866(1), c = 8.595(2) Å, α = 103.84(2)°, β = 90.12(2)°, γ = 106.75(2)°, and V = 1081.3(4) Å 3 . Brugger et al (2006) concluded that pseudojohannite is a member of the zippeite group, based on the characteristic U:S ratio 2:1 (Burns 2005; Krivovichev and Plášil 2013), and they revised chemical formula of pseudojohannite accordingly to Cu 6.5 [(UO 2 ) 4 O 4 (SO 4 ) 2 ] 2 (OH) 5 (H 2 O) 25 . The final conclusion that pseudojohannite is a member of the zippeite-group of minerals was documented by the full crystal structure solution presented by Plášil et al (2012) on the material from Widowmaker mine, White Canyon, Utah, USA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uranyl-sulfates are typical products of uraninite alteration in the acidic oxidizing environment (Ondruš et al 1997;Finch and Murakami 1999;Meisser et al 2002;Brugger et al 2003Brugger et al , 2006Plášil et al 2012a, b;Krivovichev and Plášil 2013;Plášil 2014). The sulfate-rich solutions, resulting from the decomposition of the primary sulfide minerals by descending oxidizing waters, are responsible for the migration of the uranyl ion (UO 2 ) 2+ under the low pH conditions (Fernandes et al 1995;Brugger et al 2003, and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structures of the most abundant uranyl sulfates are based upon structural units consisting of uranyl pentagonal bipyramids (Urφ 5 ; Ur = UO 2 2+ , uranyl ion, φ = unspecified ligand) and SO 4 tetrahedra (Burns 2005). Urφ 5 bipyramids may polymerize by sharing equatorial edges as in the structures of zippeite-group minerals (Vochten et al 1995;Brugger et al 2003;Burns et al 2003;Brugger et al 2006;Peeters et al 2008;Plášil et al 2011aPlášil et al , b, 2012Plášil et al , 2013a, uranopilite (Burns 2001), johannite (Mereiter 1982) and deliensite (Plášil et al 2013b). The Urφ 5 bipyramids and SO 4 tetrahedra are usually linked by corner-sharing only, although several structures involving edge-sharing between uranyl and sulfate polyhedra have also been described (Mikhailov et al 1977;Hayden and Burns 2002a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%