2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.064507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudogap in the chain states of YBa2Cu3O6.6

Abstract: As established by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) cleaved surfaces of the high temperature superconductor YBa 2 Cu 2 O 7−δ develop charge density wave (CDW) modulations in the one-dimensional (1D) CuO chains. At the same time, no signatures of the CDW have been reported in the spectral function of the chain band previously studied by photoemission. We use soft X-ray angle resolved photoemission (SX-ARPES) to detect a chain-derived surface band that had not been detected in previous work. The 2k F for the n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(61 reference statements)
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another viewpoint consists in relating pseudogaps to those competing orderings, but treating them, on the equal footing with superconductivity, as well-developed states that can be made allowance for in the mean field approximation, fluctuation effects being non-crucial. We believe that the available observations support the latter viewpoint (see, e.g., recent experimental evidences of CDW formation in various cuprates [202][203][204][205]). Moreover, although undoped cuprates are antiferromagnetic insulators [206], the CDW seems to be a more suitable candidate responsible for the pseudogap phenomena, which competes with Cooper pairing in doped high-T c oxide samples [123][124][125][126][127], contrary to what is the most probable for iron-based pnictides and chalcogenides [78,207].…”
Section: Pseudogaps As a Manifestation Of Non-superconducting Gappingsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Another viewpoint consists in relating pseudogaps to those competing orderings, but treating them, on the equal footing with superconductivity, as well-developed states that can be made allowance for in the mean field approximation, fluctuation effects being non-crucial. We believe that the available observations support the latter viewpoint (see, e.g., recent experimental evidences of CDW formation in various cuprates [202][203][204][205]). Moreover, although undoped cuprates are antiferromagnetic insulators [206], the CDW seems to be a more suitable candidate responsible for the pseudogap phenomena, which competes with Cooper pairing in doped high-T c oxide samples [123][124][125][126][127], contrary to what is the most probable for iron-based pnictides and chalcogenides [78,207].…”
Section: Pseudogaps As a Manifestation Of Non-superconducting Gappingsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…103,109 In agreement with that, a recent soft x-ray angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (SX-ARPES) experiment detected a gapped surface chain band whose nesting vector matches the modulation wave vector found by STM. 110 Comparing our bulk sensitive x-ray data results to these surface related observations is not straightforward, since the chain layer at the surface is known to be heavily overdoped. 111 However, both the modulation period (∼9-14Å) and the correlation length (∼ 40Å) reported by STM and SX-ARPES studies 103,109,110 are intriguingly close to our values for δ b (CDW) and ξ b (CDW) in Fig.…”
Section: 102mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…110 Comparing our bulk sensitive x-ray data results to these surface related observations is not straightforward, since the chain layer at the surface is known to be heavily overdoped. 111 However, both the modulation period (∼9-14Å) and the correlation length (∼ 40Å) reported by STM and SX-ARPES studies 103,109,110 are intriguingly close to our values for δ b (CDW) and ξ b (CDW) in Fig. 4.…”
Section: 102mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also note that whereas the formation of a CuO 2 plane-centered charge modulation involving the bonding band [23] is mostly decoupled from oxygen ordering within the chains, as indicated by recent x-ray scattering experiments [24], the opposite may be true for a charge modulation involving the antibonding band owing to a greater overlap of its wave function with the chains (the chains themselves being prone to different forms of order [50,51]). Local interactions with the oxygen order could cause the latter to become more susceptible to a lock-in transition or to differences in the strength of the modulation along the a and b lattice directions, potentially revealed in NMR experiments [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%